AIKO vs Boviet Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 60 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Boviet Solar leans bifacial (67% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Boviet Solar is a leading solar technology company specializing in manufacturing Monocrystalline PERC and N-Type PV cells, as well as Gamma Series™ Monofacial and Vega Series™ Bifacial PV modules. Founded in 2013 in Vietnam, the company is committed to sustainability and innovation, offering robust business stability...
- Founded
- 2013
- Headquarters
- Vietnam
- Annual capacity
- 3 GW/year
- Employees
- 1000+
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (60%)
The flagships
Written summary
AIKO is a Chinese solar manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Guangdong province, with a production network spanning multiple gigafactories across China. The company achieved Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status in 2024 and reported total ABC module shipments of approximately 14.71 GW in 2025, placing it among the higher-volume players in the industry. Boviet Solar, by contrast, is headquartered in Vietnam and operates a notably different footprint - it has held BNEF Tier 1 status continuously since 2017 and has also earned Wood Mackenzie Grade A and Kiwa PVEL Top Performer recognition. Boviet's combined Vietnam and US manufacturing capacity stands at roughly 3 GW annually, including a facility in Greenville, North Carolina. On institutional longevity and independent bankability recognition, Boviet holds the longer track record, though AIKO's sheer production scale is substantially larger.
AIKO has staked its product identity on proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, which moves both electrodes to the rear of the cell and eliminates front-side shading losses. The company markets panel families across residential (NEOSTAR series), commercial and industrial (COMET series), and utility-scale (STELLAR series) segments, with confirmed mass-production cell efficiencies around 27.2% and module efficiencies reaching approximately 24.4% - among the highest commercially available as of 2025. Boviet's lineup is built around PERC-based Gamma Series monofacial and Vega Series bifacial modules, with TOPCon and HJT modules in active development. Boviet targets commercial and utility buyers, with particular relevance for US-sited projects given its domestic manufacturing and associated IRA incentive eligibility.
For buyers prioritizing cutting-edge cell efficiency and a rapidly expanding technology roadmap, AIKO is the stronger choice. For buyers who value a longer bankability record, established US-based manufacturing, and a straightforward proven-technology stack, Boviet Solar is more compelling. The two brands occupy meaningfully different niches - AIKO as a technology-forward high-efficiency specialist, Boviet as a financially stable mid-tier manufacturer with localized US supply chain advantages - so the better default depends entirely on project location, procurement risk tolerance, and whether IRA domestic content bonuses are in scope.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-21
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.