Skip to main content

AIKO vs Aptos Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
VS
Aptos Solar
USA Founded 2019
Read the Aptos Solar review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 33 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Aptos Solar leans bifacial (52% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
144 33
Highest power
805 Wp 550 Wp
Best efficiency
25.2% 21.3%
Average efficiency
23.7% 20.6%
Bifacial share
24% 52%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Aptos Solar

Aptos Solar Technology is a U.S. based company that leverages global sourcing to provide innovative and affordable solar technology. They offer high-performance solar panels optimized with their patented Dual Nano Absorber (DNA) technology for residential, commercial, and utility applications. The company is committed...

Founded
2019
Headquarters
San Antonio, TX, USA
Employees
14
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AIKO Aptos Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 144+111 33
Max Power 805 W+255 W 550 W
Avg Power 581 W+150 W 432 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 25.20%+3.91 pp 21.29%
Avg Efficiency 23.65%+3.07 pp 20.58%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.271%/°C+0.064 -0.334%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (24%) 17 (52%)+27 pp
Avg Warranty 29.5 yrs 30.0 yrs+0.5 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

Aptos Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Aptos Solar Technology, founded in 2019 and headquartered in California with manufacturing in Vietnam, is a small, privately held company with roughly 14 employees and no formal Tier 1 bankability rating from Bloomberg NEF or comparable institutions. AIKO Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2009 in China, is publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, holds confirmed Tier 1 bankable status, and has been aggressively expanding manufacturing capacity - with plans exceeding 30 GW of back-contact cell and module output across multiple factories. On institutional footprint alone, AIKO carries significantly more weight: it has the balance sheet, scale, and third-party recognition that lenders and large project developers typically require.

The two portfolios diverge sharply on performance metrics. Aptos deploys 100% PERC cell technology across 33 products, averaging 431 Wp and 20.6% module efficiency, with a peak of 550 Wp and 21.3% - numbers that are respectable for PERC but solidly mid-tier by 2025 standards. Its temperature coefficient averages -0.334%/°C, and just over half its lineup (52%) is bifacial, making it a reasonable fit for cost-sensitive residential rooftops or small commercial installs where outright efficiency is secondary. AIKO, building 74% of its 144-product range on proprietary All Back Contact (ABC) cell technology, averages 581 Wp and 23.7% efficiency, peaks at 805 Wp and 25.2%, and delivers a markedly better temperature coefficient of -0.271%/°C - meaning less power loss on hot days. Only 24% of AIKO's lineup is bifacial, but the sheer output density targets premium rooftops and utility-scale ground mounts where maximizing watts per square meter justifies a higher price per panel. Both brands offer approximately 30-year warranties.

For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default choice where budget permits: its efficiency lead, lower thermal losses, Tier 1 status, and broad product depth make it better suited to both residential premium installs and commercial or utility projects. Aptos remains a credible option for US buyers who prioritize domestic-brand optics, need bifacial panels at moderate power classes, or are working with installers already familiar with the product - but its lack of Tier 1 recognition and limited scale are genuine considerations for any project requiring long-term financial assurance.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AIKO A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Aptos Solar
Manufacturers
AIKO AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME Aptos Solar
Manufacturers
AIKO ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Aptos Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers · See 8 Aptos Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.