AIKO vs Aptos Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 33 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Aptos Solar leans bifacial (52% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2009
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 600732
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Aptos Solar Technology is a U.S. based company that leverages global sourcing to provide innovative and affordable solar technology. They offer high-performance solar panels optimized with their patented Dual Nano Absorber (DNA) technology for residential, commercial, and utility applications. The company is committed...
- Founded
- 2019
- Headquarters
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Employees
- 14
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
Aptos Solar Technology, founded in 2019 and headquartered in California with manufacturing in Vietnam, is a small, privately held company with roughly 14 employees and no formal Tier 1 bankability rating from Bloomberg NEF or comparable institutions. AIKO Solar, by contrast, was founded in 2009 in China, is publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, holds confirmed Tier 1 bankable status, and has been aggressively expanding manufacturing capacity - with plans exceeding 30 GW of back-contact cell and module output across multiple factories. On institutional footprint alone, AIKO carries significantly more weight: it has the balance sheet, scale, and third-party recognition that lenders and large project developers typically require.
The two portfolios diverge sharply on performance metrics. Aptos deploys 100% PERC cell technology across 33 products, averaging 431 Wp and 20.6% module efficiency, with a peak of 550 Wp and 21.3% - numbers that are respectable for PERC but solidly mid-tier by 2025 standards. Its temperature coefficient averages -0.334%/°C, and just over half its lineup (52%) is bifacial, making it a reasonable fit for cost-sensitive residential rooftops or small commercial installs where outright efficiency is secondary. AIKO, building 74% of its 144-product range on proprietary All Back Contact (ABC) cell technology, averages 581 Wp and 23.7% efficiency, peaks at 805 Wp and 25.2%, and delivers a markedly better temperature coefficient of -0.271%/°C - meaning less power loss on hot days. Only 24% of AIKO's lineup is bifacial, but the sheer output density targets premium rooftops and utility-scale ground mounts where maximizing watts per square meter justifies a higher price per panel. Both brands offer approximately 30-year warranties.
For most buyers in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default choice where budget permits: its efficiency lead, lower thermal losses, Tier 1 status, and broad product depth make it better suited to both residential premium installs and commercial or utility projects. Aptos remains a credible option for US buyers who prioritize domestic-brand optics, need bifacial panels at moderate power classes, or are working with installers already familiar with the product - but its lack of Tier 1 recognition and limited scale are genuine considerations for any project requiring long-term financial assurance.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 179 AIKO offers · See 8 Aptos Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.