Skip to main content

Trina Solar vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 144 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
340 144
Highest power
760 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 25.2%
Average efficiency
21.7% 23.7%
Bifacial share
43% 24%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Trina Solar AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 340+196 144
Max Power 760 W 805 W+45 W
Avg Power 520 W 581 W+61 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80% 25.20%+0.40 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.71% 23.65%+1.94 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.302%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.031
Bifacial Share 145 (43%)+18 pp 35 (24%)
Avg Warranty 28.2 yrs 29.5 yrs+1.3 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AIKO is a Chinese solar panel manufacturer headquartered in Guangdong province that has built its reputation on proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell technology, which removes front-side electrodes to deliver module efficiencies reaching 25% in its Neostar flagship series. The company achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 - a sign of growing institutional recognition - and has announced plans for BC module shipments exceeding 20 GW in 2025. AIKO has established a European presence through its Solarlab Aiko Europe research center in Freiburg, Germany and a logistics hub in the Netherlands. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, China, is one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world, having shipped 65.21 GW of panels in 2023 alone and accumulating over 205 GW in total global shipments. Trina holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and has been a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years, a combination that makes it one of the most bankable names in the photovoltaic industry. By virtually every measure of institutional footprint and supply-chain scale, Trina Solar is the more established of the two brands.

AIKO's product lineup centers on its Neostar ABC modules, which target space-constrained residential rooftop installations and commercial C&I projects where maximizing power density is the primary objective. The full-black aesthetic, Class A fire rating, and a 30-year performance warranty with a low annual degradation rate make AIKO panels attractive in premium residential and commercial segments. Trina Solar covers a broader range of use cases - from the Vertex S+ residential modules built on i-TOPCon cells to large-format Vertex modules designed for utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina's i-TOPCon technology delivers module efficiencies in the 22 to 23.8 percent range, and the brand's competitive pricing - broadly in line with mid-tier market averages - makes it suitable for both high-volume installers and individual homeowners seeking a proven, cost-effective solution.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on priorities. AIKO's ABC technology delivers a meaningful efficiency advantage and strong shade-tolerance characteristics, making it the better fit for premium, space-constrained installations where maximizing yield per square meter justifies a higher per-panel cost. Trina Solar's broader portfolio, longer operational track record, massive global supply chain, and well-documented bankability make it the lower-risk default for large-scale utility projects and budget-sensitive buyers. The two brands are not interchangeable at the high-efficiency premium end, but for standard residential and commercial-scale installations with adequate roof space, either manufacturer will deliver reliable long-term performance.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Trina Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
Trina Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
Trina Solar ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 242 Trina Solar offers · See 170 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.