Skip to main content

Seraphim vs Sunova - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Seraphim
China Founded 2011 Tier 1
Read the Seraphim review
VS
Sunova
China Founded 2008
Read the Sunova review
At a glance

Sunova has the broader catalog (183 vs 160 models). Seraphim leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
160 183
Highest power
730 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 23.2%
Average efficiency
21.8% 21.6%
Bifacial share
69% 92%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Seraphim

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Annual capacity
13 GW/year
Employees
1001-5000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Sunova
Founded
2008
Headquarters
Hefei, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Seraphim Sunova
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 160 183+23
Max Power 730 W+10 W 720 W
Avg Power 549 W+26 W 523 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.50%+0.30 pp 23.20%
Avg Efficiency 21.82%+0.22 pp 21.60%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.316%/°C+0.001 -0.317%/°C
Bifacial Share 111 (69%) 168 (92%)+22 pp
Avg Warranty 28.8 yrs+0.3 yr 28.4 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)

Seraphim cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (52%)

Sunova cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Seraphim is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2011 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for over 11 consecutive years and has earned six PVEL Top Performer awards, reflecting a long and consistent bankability record. By 2025, it had reached approximately 13 GW of global annual production capacity, with manufacturing in China and South Africa and a US-based subsidiary (SEG Solar) operating a 2 GW module factory in Houston. Sunova Solar, founded in 2016 and headquartered in China with regional offices in Germany and Brazil, achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2023, a notably more recent milestone. The company reports around 5.5 GW of operational module capacity and an additional 4.5 GW under construction across facilities in China and Vietnam. Sunova has since rebranded as Thornova Solar. On the dimension of institutional footprint and depth of bankability history, Seraphim holds a clear advantage.

Seraphim's current lineup is centered on n-type TOPCon technology, most prominently in its Nebula series, which achieves efficiencies of up to approximately 22.5%. The portfolio spans residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount applications, with half-cut cell and multi-busbar configurations available across product tiers. Sunova (now Thornova) has developed parallel TOPCon and heterojunction (HJT) lines, offering bifacial dual-glass and backsheet variants under the Thor and Tangra product families. The emphasis on HJT gives Sunova a premium angle in markets where low temperature coefficients and long-term degradation performance are priorities, and the bifacial offerings are well-suited to large ground-mount projects.

For most international buyers looking for a proven mid-tier brand with strong financing credentials, Seraphim is the safer default choice - its scale, manufacturing diversification, and 11-plus years on the BNEF Tier 1 list reduce project finance risk. Sunova (Thornova) is a credible and technically competitive alternative, particularly appealing where HJT technology or European supply chain access matters; however, its shorter bankability track record and the uncertainty that comes with a recent rebranding are factors a prudent buyer should weigh.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-15

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Seraphim A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sunova
Manufacturers
Seraphim AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sunova
Manufacturers
Seraphim AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sunova
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 5 Seraphim offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.