Seraphim vs SunEvo Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
SunEvo Solar has the broader catalog (204 vs 160 models). SunEvo Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...
- Founded
- 2011
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Annual capacity
- 13 GW/year
- Employees
- 1001-5000
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
SunEvo Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+
Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (52%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (47%)
The flagships
Written summary
Seraphim is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, with production facilities also in South Africa and Vietnam. Founded around 2011, the company has reported a global production capacity of approximately 13 GW and has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status for eleven consecutive years - a milestone that directly supports access to project finance from institutional lenders. SunEvo Solar is likewise a Chinese manufacturer, established in 2011 and based in Hefei, Anhui province, with a self-reported production capacity of around 7.5 GW. The company claims Tier 1 recognition, but this could not be independently verified through third-party analyst sources during research for this comparison - the claim appears to originate from the manufacturer's own marketing materials rather than confirmed external listings. On institutional footprint and independently verified bankability, Seraphim holds a clear advantage.
Seraphim's current product lineup is built around TOPCon and HJT cell technologies. The Nebula series covers dual-glass bifacial TOPCon modules aimed at utility-scale ground-mount and commercial applications, while the Sable series targets residential and small commercial rooftop markets with confirmed module efficiencies in the 22 to 22.8 percent range. The flagship Hydra series uses HJT technology with module efficiency confirmed above 23 percent, addressing high-performance utility and C&I segments. Seraphim backs its bifacial PERC, TOPCon, and HJT modules with a 30-year product warranty. SunEvo Solar fields a broader technology mix - PERC, TOPCon, HJT, and back-contact cells - spanning a product range from small off-grid modules to high-wattage commercial panels above 700 W. The company also markets LFP battery storage under the SunArk brand and mounting structures under SunRack, positioning itself as a potential single-vendor solution for system integrators.
For buyers prioritizing independently verified bankability and long-term warranty credibility - particularly for financed or utility-scale projects - Seraphim is the stronger default. Its diversified manufacturing footprint and decade-plus BNEF track record offer meaningful risk mitigation. SunEvo Solar may suit integrators looking for a combined panel, storage, and racking supply relationship, but independent bankability due diligence is advisable before committing to large or project-financed deployments.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-31
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.