Skip to main content

Runergy vs Solarspace - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Runergy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy review
VS
Solarspace
China Founded 2011 Tier 1
Read the Solarspace review
At a glance

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 82 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
124 82
Highest power
740 Wp 710 Wp
Best efficiency
24.1% 23.2%
Average efficiency
22.4% 22.0%
Bifacial share
77% 93%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Runergy

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year
Employees
15,000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Solarspace

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Xuzhou, China
Annual capacity
60+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Runergy Solarspace
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 124+42 82
Max Power 740 W+30 W 710 W
Avg Power 579 W+40 W 539 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.10%+0.94 pp 23.16%
Avg Efficiency 22.42%+0.38 pp 22.04%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.298%/°C+0.001 -0.299%/°C
Bifacial Share 95 (77%) 76 (93%)+16 pp
Avg Warranty 29.1 yrs 29.6 yrs+0.6 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)

Runergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%)

Solarspace cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: N-type (70%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

I have enough sourced information now.

Runergy is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu, with additional production facilities in Thailand, Vietnam and the United States. It has been recognized by BloombergNEF as a Tier 1 PV module manufacturer for six consecutive quarters through Q1 2025, and by the end of 2023 the company had shipped over 65 GW of solar cells, indicating substantial upstream cell-manufacturing scale. Solarspace has also appeared on BNEF's Tier 1 list, rejoining it in Q2 2024 after a prior absence, and operates six manufacturing bases across Cambodia, Laos and China with a global sales network spanning the Americas, Europe, Asia, Australia and the Middle East. Runergy's longer, uninterrupted Tier 1 streak and its large cell-shipment volume suggest a somewhat stronger and more consistent institutional footprint than Solarspace, whose Tier 1 status has been less continuous.

Both brands center their product lines on n-type TOPCon technology. Runergy markets bifacial dual-glass TOPCon modules such as the HY-DH144N8 for utility-scale ground-mount projects, alongside all-black TOPCon modules like the HY-DH108N8B aimed at residential and commercial rooftops; its latest TOPCon 3.0 cells have reached certified efficiencies above 26 percent, verified by Fraunhofer ISE. Solarspace's panels span a wide power range, roughly 400 to 720 watts, with efficiencies cited between 20 and 23 percent, positioning the brand in the medium price segment and covering both rooftop and larger installations; its modules have also received independent testing endorsements from RETC and PVEL. Solarspace's warranty terms are reported as relatively short, around 12 to 15 years, which buyers should weigh against typical industry norms of 25 to 30 years.

For a typical 2025 buyer prioritizing bankability and continuous Tier 1 standing, Runergy currently presents the stronger default choice, backed by its longer unbroken BNEF streak and high-efficiency TOPCon 3.0 technology. Solarspace remains a credible Tier 1 alternative, particularly where its RETC/PVEL-tested products and wide power range fit the project, but its shorter warranty and less continuous Tier 1 history warrant closer due diligence.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-01

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Runergy A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Solarspace
Manufacturers
Runergy AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Solarspace
Manufacturers
Runergy AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Solarspace
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers · See 6 Solarspace offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.