Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs Rarlon PV Tech - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
Rarlon PV Tech
China
Read the Rarlon PV Tech review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 52 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 52
Highest power
675 Wp 550 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 21.5%
Average efficiency
21.2% 18.3%
Bifacial share
39% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Rarlon PV Tech

Rarlon PV Tech, also known as Rarlon Solar, has specialized in the solar field for over 10 years. They are a professional manufacturer and supplier of green energy products, engaging in the production and installation of solar panels, solar systems, and solar projects. Their products are exported to various countries...

Headquarters
Ningbo, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells Rarlon PV Tech
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89+37 52
Max Power 675 W+125 W 550 W
Avg Power 468 W+117 W 351 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20%+1.70 pp 21.50%
Avg Efficiency 21.21%+2.88 pp 18.33%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C+0.115 -0.439%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (39%)+39 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs+2.0 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

Rarlon PV Tech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (77%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS under South Korea's Hanwha Group, traces its roots to a German startup founded in 1999 and has grown into one of the world's most recognizable solar brands. The company maintains BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates a global manufacturing footprint that includes facilities in South Korea, Malaysia, and - notably - the largest solar manufacturing complex in the Western Hemisphere, spread across Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia. Reported module capacity across its US plants alone exceeds 8 GW per year, with global module shipments anticipated to surpass 9 GW in 2025. Rarlon PV Tech, trading as Ningbo Rarlon Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd., is a smaller Chinese manufacturer headquartered in the High-Tech Zone of Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, with over a decade of operating history. It holds TUV, CE, and ISO 9001 certifications and is listed in the ENFSolar panel directory, but no evidence of BloombergNEF Tier 1 status was found in publicly available sources. In terms of institutional scale and bankability, Q-Cells holds a considerably stronger footprint.

Q-Cells builds its current catalog around the Q.ANTUM NEO platform, an N-type TOPCon cell architecture that the company has transferred to mass production, with flagship modules in the Q.TRON series reaching over 22.5% efficiency. Its panels target premium residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial installations in the US and European markets, where the domestic manufacturing angle adds regulatory and supply-chain appeal. Rarlon PV Tech occupies a different segment, offering a wide wattage range - from small-format off-grid panels to larger mono PERC modules - aimed at price-sensitive buyers in emerging markets across Europe, South America, the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia.

For a typical buyer in 2025 seeking a bankable, well-warranted panel for a grid-tied residential or commercial project, Q-Cells is the stronger default choice. Rarlon PV Tech may suit off-grid or budget-constrained projects in markets where financing requirements and long-term warranty support are secondary concerns, but the two brands are not interchangeable for mainstream financed installations.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-21

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Rarlon PV Tech
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Rarlon PV Tech
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Rarlon PV Tech
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 23 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.