Skip to main content

Philadelphia Solar vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Philadelphia Solar
Jordan Founded 2007 Tier 1
Read the Philadelphia Solar review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Philadelphia Solar has the broader catalog (99 vs 89 models). Philadelphia Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.53%. Philadelphia Solar leans bifacial (67% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
99 89
Highest power
650 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 23.2%
Average efficiency
20.9% 21.2%
Bifacial share
67% 39%
Average warranty
27 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Philadelphia Solar

Philadelphia Solar is a Jordanian Tier 1 solar module and steel mounting structure manufacturer that was established in 2007. It is the first MEA-based company to manufacture, develop, design, construct, own, and operate utility-scale, commercial and industrial photovoltaic plants. The company exports to over 52...

Founded
2007
Headquarters
Amman, Jordan
Annual capacity
0.58 GW/year
Employees
51-200
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Philadelphia Solar Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 99+10 89
Max Power 650 W 675 W+25 W
Avg Power 471 W+3 W 468 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.53%+0.33 pp 23.20%
Avg Efficiency 20.90% 21.21%+0.32 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.333%/°C -0.325%/°C+0.008
Bifacial Share 66 (67%)+27 pp 35 (39%)
Avg Warranty 26.9 yrs 27.0 yrs+0.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Philadelphia Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Philadelphia Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (55%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Philadelphia Solar is a Jordanian manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Amman, with a module factory operating in the sub-gigawatt range. The company has announced plans to expand into U.S. production and has been building its international profile, rising on the PV ModuleTech bankability scale to a CC-category rating as of mid-2024 - a mid-tier result that reflects a company still growing its financial standing in a competitive field. Q-Cells, now operating under the Hanwha Qcells brand, has far deeper institutional roots: originally founded in Germany in 1999, it is a subsidiary of South Korea's Hanwha Group, carries a BloombergNEF Tier 1 module rating, and was named to S&P Global's 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech Company list. With global module capacity exceeding 11 GW per year and a U.S. facility in Dalton, Georgia, that stands among the largest solar manufacturing sites in North America, Hanwha Qcells holds a considerably stronger institutional and financial footprint.

Philadelphia Solar's portfolio centers on mono-facial and bifacial PERC monocrystalline modules, oriented toward commercial and utility-scale buyers across the Middle East, Africa, and neighboring emerging markets where regional proximity and competitive pricing carry weight. Hanwha Qcells spans a wider range: its Q.PEAK line uses PERC technology suited to residential and commercial rooftops, while the newer Q.TRON series deploys N-type TOPCon via the Q.ANTUM NEO platform, reaching module efficiencies in the low-to-mid 22% range per SolarReviews' 2025 analysis. This breadth covers everything from premium residential installations to large ground-mount projects.

For most buyers in 2025, Hanwha Qcells is the clearer default - it combines a wider technology range, strong bankability, a domestic U.S. supply chain relevant to IRA incentive compliance, and a well-documented global track record. Philadelphia Solar remains a credible and competitively priced option for buyers in Jordan, the broader Middle East, and Africa who value local sourcing, but it cannot yet match Qcells in scale, bankability tier, or product breadth.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-29

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Philadelphia Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Philadelphia Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Philadelphia Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 5 Philadelphia Solar offers · See 23 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.