New East Solar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 30 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. New East Solar leans bifacial (67% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
New East Solar Energy (NE Solar) is a Cambodia-based solar cell and module manufacturer specializing in high-efficiency Mono and Poly PERC solar cells and modules. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Cambodia, Indonesia, and a new 2 GW factory in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. NE Solar holds a BNEF Tier 1...
- Headquarters
- Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Annual capacity
- 5-10 GW/year
- Employees
- 201-500
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
New East Solar Energy (Cambodia) Co., Ltd., trading as NE Solar, is a solar module manufacturer headquartered in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, with production facilities in Cambodia, Indonesia, and a 2 GW factory in Phoenix, Arizona. The company's total manufacturing capacity stands at approximately 6.7 GW per year. NE Solar achieved a BloombergNEF Tier 1 ranking in 2024, affirming its bankability, and its modules have earned recognition as PVEL Top Performers. Trina Solar, headquartered in Changzhou, China, is one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world, having reached an annual production capacity of 100 GW. The company has topped BloombergNEF's bankability ranking eight times and received a unanimous 100% rating in 2025, while also recording 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. In terms of scale, longevity, and institutional standing, Trina Solar holds a substantially stronger global footprint.
NE Solar produces modules across PERC, bifacial, TOPCon, and N-type cell technologies, covering a power range of roughly 395 to 715 Wp. Its portfolio targets residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and smaller ground-mount applications. The company's U.S. manufacturing presence makes it a relevant option for buyers who require non-Chinese-origin supply chains under domestic content incentive rules or procurement policies. Trina Solar's flagship product line is the Vertex N series, built on N-type i-TOPCon cell technology, with modules reaching up to 760 Wp and a confirmed cell efficiency of 24.5%. The series spans residential panels around 495 Wp, C&I formats near 670 Wp, and large-format utility-scale modules exceeding 700 Wp. Flagship Vertex N models carry 30-year performance warranties, an industry-leading commitment.
For most international buyers - whether a residential installer or a utility-scale developer - Trina Solar represents the lower-risk default: decades of field data, a deep global distribution network, and project finance acceptance from a broad base of lenders. NE Solar is a credible and growing alternative, particularly where supply-chain diversification or U.S.-origin manufacturing matters. Both brands carry BNEF Tier 1 status, so technical risk is broadly comparable at the module level; the meaningful gap lies in Trina Solar's track record, warranty depth, and secondary-market familiarity.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-03
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 211 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.