Skip to main content

LG vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

LG
South Korea Founded 1958
Read the LG review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 24 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
24 89
Highest power
455 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
22.1% 23.2%
Average efficiency
20.7% 21.2%
Bifacial share
17% 39%
Average warranty
25 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
LG

LG Electronics is a South Korean multinational electronics company. Founded in 1958, LG is a global leader and technology innovator in consumer electronics, mobile communications, and home appliances. Although LG officially closed its solar panel business in 2022, the company continues to offer support for existing...

Founded
1958
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Employees
74,000+
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric LG Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 24 89+65
Max Power 455 W 675 W+220 W
Avg Power 404 W 468 W+64 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.10% 23.20%+1.10 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.74% 21.21%+0.48 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.315%/°C+0.010 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 4 (17%) 35 (39%)+23 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.0 yrs+2.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

LG cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (100%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

LG is a South Korean electronics conglomerate that entered the photovoltaic business in the 1980s - under its former name GoldStar - and developed its solar division into a premium brand over the following decades. In February 2022, however, LG announced it would permanently exit solar panel manufacturing, citing unsustainable raw-material costs and intensifying price competition; production at its Huntsville, Alabama facility ceased by June of that year. LG never re-entered the market. Hanwha Q CELLS, by contrast, is an active producer. Originally founded in 1999 in Germany, it was acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012 and has since grown into a BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankable manufacturer, confirmed in its most recent bankability assessment, and was named an S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech company in 2025. With total module shipments anticipated to exceed 9 GW in 2025 and a fully integrated U.S. manufacturing campus in Georgia (Cartersville and Dalton), Q CELLS carries the stronger institutional footprint by a wide margin.

LG's discontinued lineup - centered on its NeON 2 and NeON R series using N-type IBC cells - reached efficiency figures up to approximately 22.3% and was aimed squarely at premium residential rooftops where space was constrained. Remaining inventory is still traded on the secondary market, but no new production exists. Q CELLS serves a much broader range of applications: its Q.TRON residential series uses monocrystalline half-cut cells with a low annual degradation rate of around 0.33%, while commercial and utility-scale product lines address ground-mount and carport installations. The 2025-generation QTron M-G2+ series has pushed peak efficiency to competitive levels for the monocrystalline segment.

For any buyer in 2025 or beyond, the comparison is effectively decided by LG's market exit: Q CELLS is the only live option of the two. It offers active warranties backed by a major conglomerate, a growing domestic U.S. manufacturing base, and broad product availability. LG panels from existing stock may still suit budget-conscious retrofits, but without new production, the brand cannot be recommended as a primary choice for new installations.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-15

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
LG A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
LG AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
LG AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 3 LG offers · See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.