Skip to main content

Jolywood vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jolywood
China Founded 2008 Tier 1
Read the Jolywood review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 128 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
128 340
Highest power
715 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
23.6% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.5% 21.7%
Bifacial share
86% 43%
Average warranty
30 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jolywood
Founded
2008
Headquarters
Taizhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jolywood Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 128 340+212
Max Power 715 W 760 W+45 W
Avg Power 554 W+33 W 520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.60% 24.80%+1.20 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.54%+0.83 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.284%/°C+0.018 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 110 (86%)+43 pp 145 (43%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+1.8 yr 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)

Jolywood cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jolywood is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Changshu, Jiangsu Province. Listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2014, it has established itself as one of the early commercial pioneers of N-type TOPCon cell technology. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates a cell production capacity of approximately 20 GW, with module output around 10 GW per year. Trina Solar traces its roots to 1997, when founder Gao Jifan established the company in Changzhou, also in Jiangsu Province. Listed on Shanghai's STAR Market, Trina has grown into one of the world's largest solar module suppliers, shipping over 70 GW in 2024 alone and surpassing 292 GW in cumulative global shipments by mid-2025. Both brands carry BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, but Trina Solar's scale, tenure, and breadth of global distribution give it a considerably stronger institutional footprint.

Jolywood has built its reputation around bifacial N-type TOPCon modules. The NIWA series is well regarded in the European residential rooftop segment, delivering efficiencies in the range of 22-23% in a compact format suited to home installations. The JW192R series uses rectangular-cut wafers to push output higher and targets commercial rooftops and medium-scale ground-mount projects. Trina Solar organizes its portfolio around the Vertex platform. The Vertex S+ G3 addresses residential and commercial rooftop applications using N-type i-TOPCon cells, while the Vertex N and the newer Vertex N G3 target utility-scale ground-mount installations at outputs reaching up to 760 W. Trina's i-TOPCon cells have recorded a lab conversion efficiency of 26.58%, and the Vertex N TOPCon Ultra line extends that technology into large-format commercial and industrial deployments.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default: its longer track record, wider installer ecosystem, and more established after-sales infrastructure reduce project exposure, particularly on utility-scale or long-horizon investments. Jolywood is a credible alternative - especially for buyers seeking a specialist N-type TOPCon focus or competitive pricing in the European residential market. The quality gap between the two brands is not wide, and both perform well in independent reliability assessments, so buyers already working with a trusted Jolywood supply chain have no compelling technical reason to switch.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jolywood A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Jolywood AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Jolywood AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers · See 242 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.