Jolywood vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 128 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Taizhou, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 300393
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Jolywood offers more 600W+ panels (38% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jolywood is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Changshu, Jiangsu Province. Listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2014, it has established itself as one of the early commercial pioneers of N-type TOPCon cell technology. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and operates a cell production capacity of approximately 20 GW, with module output around 10 GW per year. Trina Solar traces its roots to 1997, when founder Gao Jifan established the company in Changzhou, also in Jiangsu Province. Listed on Shanghai's STAR Market, Trina has grown into one of the world's largest solar module suppliers, shipping over 70 GW in 2024 alone and surpassing 292 GW in cumulative global shipments by mid-2025. Both brands carry BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, but Trina Solar's scale, tenure, and breadth of global distribution give it a considerably stronger institutional footprint.
Jolywood has built its reputation around bifacial N-type TOPCon modules. The NIWA series is well regarded in the European residential rooftop segment, delivering efficiencies in the range of 22-23% in a compact format suited to home installations. The JW192R series uses rectangular-cut wafers to push output higher and targets commercial rooftops and medium-scale ground-mount projects. Trina Solar organizes its portfolio around the Vertex platform. The Vertex S+ G3 addresses residential and commercial rooftop applications using N-type i-TOPCon cells, while the Vertex N and the newer Vertex N G3 target utility-scale ground-mount installations at outputs reaching up to 760 W. Trina's i-TOPCon cells have recorded a lab conversion efficiency of 26.58%, and the Vertex N TOPCon Ultra line extends that technology into large-format commercial and industrial deployments.
For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default: its longer track record, wider installer ecosystem, and more established after-sales infrastructure reduce project exposure, particularly on utility-scale or long-horizon investments. Jolywood is a credible alternative - especially for buyers seeking a specialist N-type TOPCon focus or competitive pricing in the European residential market. The quality gap between the two brands is not wide, and both perform well in independent reliability assessments, so buyers already working with a trusted Jolywood supply chain have no compelling technical reason to switch.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers · See 242 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.