Skip to main content

Jolywood vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jolywood
China Founded 2008 Tier 1
Read the Jolywood review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 128 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Jolywood leans bifacial (86% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
128 144
Highest power
715 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
23.6% 25.2%
Average efficiency
22.5% 23.7%
Bifacial share
86% 24%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jolywood
Founded
2008
Headquarters
Taizhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jolywood AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 128 144+16
Max Power 715 W 805 W+90 W
Avg Power 554 W 581 W+28 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.60% 25.20%+1.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.54% 23.65%+1.11 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.284%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.014
Bifacial Share 110 (86%)+62 pp 35 (24%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+0.5 yr 29.5 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

Jolywood cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (95%)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jolywood is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Changshu, Jiangsu Province, with manufacturing operations across Suzhou and Taizhou. The company was publicly listed in 2014 and is widely credited as one of the earliest industrialisers of n-type TOPCon cell technology, having pushed into GW-scale TOPCon production around 2016. Jolywood also holds a roughly 30% global market share in solar backsheets, giving it a vertically integrated position few peers can match. It has maintained a recurring presence on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module maker list and reports a module production capacity in the range of 10 GW per year. AIKO is a Guangdong-based company founded in 2009 that has staked its identity almost entirely on N-type All Back Contact (ABC) cell technology, where all electrodes are moved to the rear of the cell to eliminate front-side shading losses. AIKO earned its first BNEF Tier 1 listing in Q3 2024 and is rapidly scaling output, with a new Jinan facility targeting 30 GW of combined cell and module capacity. On institutional footprint and production scale, Jolywood currently holds the longer track record.

In terms of product focus, Jolywood leans toward utility and commercial ground-mount applications, offering bifacial dual-glass TOPCon modules - including its ruggedised Windproof line rated from 570 W to 595 W for extreme climates - as well as standard residential formats. AIKO targets the premium end of the market, particularly residential and commercial rooftops where roof space is constrained. Its ABC modules have consistently ranked at or near the top of the Taiyangnews global module efficiency charts since March 2023, with mass-produced module efficiencies reaching up to 24.4%, and the brand offers a 30-year performance warranty with a notably low annual degradation rate of 0.35% per year after year one.

For a buyer prioritising maximum efficiency in limited roof space, AIKO is the stronger choice in 2025, particularly for residential installs. For utility-scale or harsh-environment projects where long-term bankability, broad product range, and deeper supply chain integration matter more than peak efficiency, Jolywood is the more established option.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jolywood A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
Jolywood AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
Jolywood ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 45 Jolywood offers · See 171 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.