Jinko Solar vs Weran Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 17 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Weran Solar skews to higher efficiency: 41% of lineup is 23%+
Weran Solar offers more 600W+ panels (65% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and has grown into one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, listed on the NYSE with over 33,800 employees and an annual production capacity of 130 GW. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, making it eligible for institutional project financing across global markets. Its cumulative shipments surpassed 390 GW by end of 2025, with the Tiger Neo TOPCon series alone exceeding 220 GW - the best-selling module series in industry history. Weran Solar is a considerably smaller manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, founded around 2015, without Tier 1 bankable status. It offers a narrow portfolio of only 17 models and has very limited coverage from independent third-party reviewers, though it appeared at the SNEC PV+ 2025 conference showcasing HPBC 2.0 modules rated at 24.6% peak efficiency. The cell technology classification for the bulk of Weran's portfolio remains undocumented in public sources.
Jinko Solar's primary strength lies in scale, portfolio breadth, and technology leadership. TOPCon accounts for roughly 39% of its 545-panel lineup, delivering a maximum output of 735 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 24.8%. Eleven consecutive PVEL Top Performer designations speak to manufacturing consistency. These qualities make Jinko a reliable pick for residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications alike. Weran Solar, despite its smaller scale, posts a higher average efficiency (22.9% vs. 22.0%), a more favorable average temperature coefficient (-0.276%/°C vs. -0.308%/°C), and a higher average module power (571 Wp vs. 511 Wp) - metrics that on paper suggest a portfolio skewed toward larger-format, higher-performing panels. Its 35.3% bifacial share also slightly edges out Jinko's 31.9%, which could appeal to buyers prioritizing bifacial ground-mount configurations.
For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk option by a wide margin: Tier 1 bankability, a transparent technology roadmap, a global service network, and an average product warranty of 28.5 years make it straightforward for project financing and long-term asset management. Weran Solar may attract buyers seeking high-power panels at competitive price points in a narrow SKU selection, but the absence of Tier 1 status, limited independent quality data, and uncertain cell technology documentation introduce financial and quality assurance risks that should be carefully evaluated - particularly for larger commercial or utility deployments where bankability and long-term performance guarantees are critical.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.