Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Leapton - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Leapton
Japan Founded 2012 Tier 1
Read the Leapton review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 119 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Leapton leans bifacial (49% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 119
Highest power
735 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.3%
Average efficiency
22.2% 22.2%
Bifacial share
36% 49%
Average warranty
29 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Leapton

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Kobe, Japan
Annual capacity
3+ GW/year
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Leapton
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+518 119
Max Power 735 W+15 W 720 W
Avg Power 523 W 546 W+24 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.48 pp 23.32%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+0.00 pp 22.18%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.002 -0.307%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 58 (49%)+12 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 29.5 yrs+0.8 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Leapton cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (88%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Leapton are both Tier 1 bankable solar panel manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global PV market. Founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, Jinko Solar is listed on the NYSE and operates at a production capacity of 130 GW, employing over 33,800 people - making it one of the largest module manufacturers in the world, with approximately 41 GW shipped in the first half of 2025 alone. Leapton, headquartered in Japan with manufacturing based in China, was founded in 2012 and reports a production capacity of 3+ GW. While considerably smaller in scale, Leapton has steadily expanded its presence across more than 70 countries, positioning itself as a quality-focused, competitively priced Tier 1 alternative to the industry giants. Both companies have achieved Tier 1 bankability, giving project financiers confidence in either brand for long-term performance guarantees.

On the technology front, both manufacturers have committed strongly to N-type TOPCon cell technology, though Leapton's portfolio is more deeply concentrated in it - 88.2% of its panel range uses TOPCon versus approximately 39.4% for Jinko. Jinko's broader portfolio reaches a higher maximum output of 735 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.8%, backed by laboratory cell efficiency records exceeding 27%. Leapton's top module reaches 720 Wp and 23.32% efficiency, but its portfolio shows a higher average bifacial ratio (48.7% versus 31.9% for Jinko) and a slightly longer average product warranty of around 29.5 years compared to Jinko's 28.5 years. Jinko is the stronger candidate for large-scale utility and commercial C&I projects where supply chain depth, consistent batch quality, and brand recognition with lenders matter most. Leapton's high bifacial share and TOPCon-focused lineup make it a compelling option for residential rooftop installs and ground-mount systems where bifacial energy yield is a key design parameter.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar offers the reassurance of unmatched scale, a decade-long track record of PVEL Top Performer results, and straightforward access through established distribution networks across Europe and beyond. Leapton represents a solid value-oriented choice - particularly for installers seeking a nearly all-TOPCon bifacial portfolio with strong warranty terms at a more accessible price point. The right choice depends on project size and risk appetite: Jinko for volume and bankability confidence, Leapton for efficient niche deployment where bifacial TOPCon performance and cost-efficiency are the priority.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Leapton
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Leapton
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Leapton
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 155 Jinko Solar offers · See 5 Leapton offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.