Skip to main content

AE Solar vs Leapton - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AE Solar
Germany Founded 2003 Tier 1
Read the AE Solar review
VS
Leapton
Japan Founded 2012 Tier 1
Read the Leapton review
At a glance

AE Solar has the broader catalog (646 vs 119 models). AE Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.43%. AE Solar leans bifacial (63% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
646 119
Highest power
730 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
24.4% 23.3%
Average efficiency
21.1% 22.2%
Bifacial share
63% 49%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AE Solar

AE Solar is a German Tier 1 manufacturer of high-efficiency photovoltaic (PV) modules. The company specializes in producing durable and innovative solar panels with German engineering standards, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications. AE Solar operates in over 100 countries and...

Founded
2003
Headquarters
Gersthofen, Germany
Annual capacity
2+ GW/year
Employees
501-1000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Leapton

Leapton Energy, headquartered in Japan, is a global leader in the solar PV industry, specializing in Tier-1 solar modules, battery energy storage systems (BESS), and inverters. With over 10 years of experience, Leapton Energy's products are now available in more than 70 countries worldwide.

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Kobe, Japan
Annual capacity
3+ GW/year
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AE Solar Leapton
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 646+527 119
Max Power 730 W+10 W 720 W
Avg Power 489 W 546 W+58 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.43%+1.11 pp 23.32%
Avg Efficiency 21.11% 22.18%+1.07 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.312%/°C -0.307%/°C+0.005
Bifacial Share 405 (63%)+14 pp 58 (49%)
Avg Warranty 29.7 yrs+0.2 yr 29.5 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AE Solar skews to higher efficiency: 9% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Leapton offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)

AE Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (54%)

Leapton cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (88%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AE Solar, founded in 2003 and headquartered in Gersthofen, Germany, is one of Europe's most established solar module manufacturers, with over two decades of market presence and distribution across more than 95 countries. The company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status and operates manufacturing facilities in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with a combined annual production capacity exceeding 2 GW. Leapton Energy, founded in 2012 in Kobe, Japan, is a newer entrant that has rapidly scaled to a production capacity exceeding 3 GW, manufacturing its panels at facilities in Changshu, China. Both manufacturers carry Tier 1 bankable certification, placing them in comparable financial reliability tiers for project financing purposes. AE Solar's broader portfolio of 442 panel models contrasts with Leapton's more focused lineup of 119 models, the latter being heavily weighted toward TOPCon technology at 88.2% of its range versus 49.8% for AE Solar.

On the technology side, Leapton holds an edge in average module efficiency (22.18% versus 21.34%) and average panel power output (546 Wp versus 497 Wp), reflecting its more homogeneous, predominantly TOPCon-based portfolio. AE Solar counters with a higher maximum rated power in its lineup (730 Wp versus 720 Wp), a higher peak efficiency ceiling (24.43% versus 23.32%), and a significantly larger share of bifacial modules (63.8% versus 48.7%), making it well suited to ground-mount utility-scale and agrivoltaic projects where bifacial gain adds measurable yield. Leapton earned Top Performer recognition in four PVEL reliability test categories in the 2024-2025 scorecard - thermal cycling, mechanical stress sequence, hail stress sequence, and LID+LETID - demonstrating strong durability credentials across a range of stress conditions. AE Solar similarly received PV Top Performer recognition in 2023 for thermal cycling and mechanical stress performance.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on project type and priorities. AE Solar's wider product range, strong European brand recognition, and high bifacial module share make it particularly compelling for residential rooftop installs across Europe, as well as for utility-scale and agrivoltaic ground-mount projects. Leapton's tighter, predominantly TOPCon portfolio with higher average efficiency and extensive PVEL reliability validation positions it as a strong choice for commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop projects where maximizing energy yield per square meter is critical. Both manufacturers offer comparable warranty terms averaging approximately 29.5 years, and both represent credible, bankable options for installers and project developers operating in competitive markets.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AE Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AEET Leapton
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
AKCOME Leapton
Manufacturers
AE Solar ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Leapton
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 5 AE Solar offers · See 9 Leapton offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.