Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Runergy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Runergy
China Founded 2013 Tier 1
Read the Runergy review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 124 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 124
Highest power
740 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 24.1%
Average efficiency
21.1% 22.4%
Bifacial share
47% 77%
Average warranty
28 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Runergy

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Founded
2013
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year
Employees
15,000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Runergy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+380 124
Max Power 740 W 740 W
Avg Power 456 W 579 W+123 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+0.70 pp 24.10%
Avg Efficiency 21.13% 22.42%+1.28 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C -0.298%/°C+0.023
Bifacial Share 238 (47%) 95 (77%)+29 pp
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs 29.1 yrs+1.2 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Runergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (60%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Runergy are both China-based, Tier 1 bankable solar module manufacturers, though they differ substantially in scale, market reach, and corporate history. JA Solar was founded in 2005 and is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, employing over 37,000 people and operating a module production capacity exceeding 100 GW. The company consistently ranks among the world's largest module producers - Wood Mackenzie placed JA Solar jointly first in its global module manufacturer ranking for the first half of 2025, and the firm earned Top Performer status in PVEL reliability testing for the tenth consecutive time. Runergy was founded in 2013 and employs approximately 15,000 people. Its module production capacity stands at 23 GW, but it operates 63 GW of solar cell manufacturing capacity across facilities in China and Thailand, positioning it primarily as a major upstream cell supplier to other global brands - including JA Solar, Canadian Solar, and GCL - while also selling finished modules under its Hyperion brand. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankability status, making financing accessible for projects using either brand.

JA Solar's portfolio of 524 panel models is built predominantly on PERC cell technology (approximately 52% of the lineup), with growing TOPCon and N-type additions, yielding an average module efficiency of 20.9% and an average rated power of 442 Wp. Its breadth of range and strong logistics network make it well-suited for residential rooftop installations, mid-scale commercial C&I projects, and utility-scale ground-mount deployments alike - wherever supply flexibility and brand familiarity matter. Runergy's more focused 98-model portfolio is heavily oriented toward N-type cell technology (over 58% of panels), delivering a significantly higher average efficiency of 22.2% and average power of 574 Wp. Its bifacial penetration reaches 78.6% compared to 44.3% for JA Solar, and its average temperature coefficient of -0.303%/°C outperforms JA Solar's -0.323%/°C, meaning better real-world output under elevated operating temperatures. These characteristics make Runergy particularly compelling for high-density commercial rooftops and utility-scale ground-mount projects where yield per unit area is the primary driver. The company also claims a world-record 26.55% full-area N-type cell efficiency, certified by Germany's ISFH, underscoring its standing as a technology leader in cell manufacturing.

For buyers prioritizing supply reliability, brand recognition, a wide product selection across all segments, and a proven two-decade track record, JA Solar represents a low-risk default choice supported by top-tier global rankings. Runergy offers a technically superior average panel specification - especially attractive for projects demanding maximum power density, strong bifacial yield gains, and cutting-edge N-type performance - but its smaller module portfolio and more limited brand exposure relative to JA Solar may warrant additional supply-chain due diligence for large-volume procurement. Both manufacturers provide competitive warranty terms, with Runergy's average of approximately 28.9 years slightly exceeding JA Solar's 27.9 years, reflecting confidence in long-term product durability from both sides.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Runergy
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Runergy
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Runergy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers · See 4 Runergy offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.