Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 89 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 89
Highest power
740 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
21.1% 21.2%
Bifacial share
47% 39%
Average warranty
28 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+415 89
Max Power 740 W+65 W 675 W
Avg Power 456 W 468 W+12 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.60 pp 23.20%
Avg Efficiency 21.13% 21.21%+0.08 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C+0.003 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+8 pp 35 (39%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs+0.9 yr 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar was founded in 2005 in China and has grown into one of the world's largest solar manufacturers, with a workforce exceeding 37,000 employees and a production capacity of over 100 GW per year. Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS under South Korean conglomerate Hanwha, was founded in 1999 and carries a production capacity of 11.2 GW. Both manufacturers hold Tier 1 bankable status - JA Solar is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) and Q-Cells on NASDAQ. The scale difference is substantial: JA Solar's catalogue spans 524 panel models compared to Q-Cells' 91, reflecting the Chinese manufacturer's strategy of covering the entire market spectrum from residential to utility. JA Solar achieved second place and Q-Cells third place in SolarReviews' 2025 manufacturer rankings, underlining that both are widely regarded as top-tier choices.

Both manufacturers lead their portfolios with PERC cell technology - accounting for 52% of JA Solar's lineup and 38% of Q-Cells'. JA Solar reaches a maximum panel output of 740 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 24.4%, positioning it strongly for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where maximising output per string and minimising cost-per-watt are the primary drivers. Q-Cells achieves a slightly higher average portfolio efficiency of 21.26% versus 20.87% for JA Solar, and its proprietary Q.ANTUM technology incorporates anti-PID and anti-LID safeguards that appeal to buyers in demanding climates. Q-Cells also operates the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia - a compliance advantage in markets that favour Western supply chains. Warranty terms across both portfolios are comparable: JA Solar averages 27.85 years and Q-Cells 27.09 years. Bifacial panel share is similar at 44.3% for JA Solar and 41.8% for Q-Cells.

Buyers choosing between the two will generally find JA Solar the stronger option for price-sensitive, large-scale deployments where output variety and supply reliability matter most. Q-Cells suits projects where premium brand perception, Western manufacturing credentials, or proven anti-degradation technology in residential or commercial rooftop contexts are the deciding factors.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers · See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.