Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Peimar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Peimar
Italy Founded 2012
Read the Peimar review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 5 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 5
Highest power
740 Wp 595 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.0%
Average efficiency
21.1% 20.2%
Bifacial share
47% 40%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Peimar

Peimar is an Italian manufacturer of photovoltaic modules. Based in Turin, the company designs and produces solar panels for residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications, with a focus on the European market.

Founded
2012
Headquarters
Torino, Italy
Annual capacity
0.3 GW/year
Employees
50
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Peimar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+499 5
Max Power 740 W+145 W 595 W
Avg Power 456 W+16 W 440 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.76 pp 23.04%
Avg Efficiency 21.13%+0.91 pp 20.23%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C+0.024 -0.346%/°C
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+7 pp 2 (40%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs 30.0 yrs+2.1 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Peimar skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Peimar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (60%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar was founded in 2005 in China and is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). With over 37,000 employees and a production capacity exceeding 100 GW, the company consistently ranks among the world's top solar module manufacturers - in Wood Mackenzie's H1 2025 global ranking, it jointly held the top position alongside Trinasolar. Its Tier 1 bankable status makes it a standard reference for project finance across residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments worldwide. Peimar, by contrast, is a much smaller Italian manufacturer established in 2012, employing approximately 50 people and operating with an annual production capacity of 0.3 GW. The company does not hold Tier 1 status, but its defining characteristic is that all manufacturing stages are carried out at its facility in Castegnato, Brescia, in northern Italy - a meaningful differentiator for buyers prioritizing European supply chains, reduced carbon footprint credentials, or compliance with local content requirements in EU-funded projects.

JA Solar's portfolio of over 520 panel models spans a wide power range up to 740 Wp, with PERC cells still representing the majority of the lineup at approximately 52%, while the TOPCon-based Deep Blue 4.0 series and newer generations push maximum efficiency to 24.4% against a portfolio average of around 20.9%. The company's scale, Tier 1 status, and recognition as a Top Brand PV across multiple European markets including Poland make it the natural default for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bankability, product availability, and competitive pricing driven by 100+ GW manufacturing capacity are decisive factors. Peimar's compact portfolio of eight models is heavily weighted toward TOPCon technology (87.5% of the lineup), delivering an average efficiency of 22.8% and a maximum of 23.04% - well above JA Solar's portfolio average. With 87.5% of panels being bifacial, an average output of 565 Wp, and a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C (versus -0.32%/°C for JA Solar), Peimar's modules are well suited to space-constrained residential rooftop installations, premium commercial projects, and bifacial ground-mount applications where rear-side gain matters.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges on scale and strategic priorities. JA Solar is the more practical choice for large-scale deployments, where its bankability, global logistics reach, and cost efficiency driven by massive manufacturing scale provide clear advantages. Peimar is the stronger option for European buyers who value domestic manufacturing provenance, are willing to pay a premium for a verified Italian producer, and are working on projects where high efficiency in limited space, supply chain transparency, or European origin labeling carries more weight than the lowest cost per watt.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Peimar
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Peimar
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Peimar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers · See 14 Peimar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.