Skip to main content

Hyundai vs MSolar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
MSolar
Headquarters not published
Read the MSolar review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 5 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 5
Highest power
640 Wp 370 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% 19.8%
Average efficiency
21.5% 19.3%
Bifacial share
66% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai MSolar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65+60 5
Max Power 640 W+270 W 370 W
Avg Power 442 W+82 W 360 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40%+3.60 pp 19.80%
Avg Efficiency 21.49%+2.22 pp 19.27%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C+0.060 -0.360%/°C
Bifacial Share 43 (66%)+66 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs+2.4 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Hyundai offers more 600W+ panels (5% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

MSolar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Heavy Industries Green Energy, a subsidiary of the South Korean conglomerate Hyundai Heavy Industries, has been manufacturing solar modules since 2005 out of its facility in EumSeong, South Korea. The division holds Tier 1 bankable status and serves major markets including the United States, Europe, Japan, and South Korea. Module production capacity has been reported at roughly 800 MW, placing it in the sub-gigawatt tier - credible but well below the multi-GW scale of Chinese market leaders. MSolar is an American company founded in 2018 and headquartered in Woodbridge, Virginia. It has operated primarily as an importer and reseller of panels rather than a large-scale manufacturer, and carries no confirmed Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability designation. In June 2026 the company announced a $23.7 million investment to build a 56,000-square-foot vertically integrated factory in Mount Jackson, Virginia, targeting HJT cell and module production. Hyundai carries the stronger institutional footprint by a considerable margin.

Hyundai's product lineup spans residential rooftop and commercial applications, with current models leveraging N-type TOPCon and HJT cell technologies and confirmed module efficiencies reaching into the low-to-mid 22% range. Warranties run 25 to 30 years. MSolar's existing catalog consists largely of monocrystalline PERC modules in the 350 W-370 W output range, with efficiencies reported around 19% to 20% - serviceable for budget residential and small commercial installations. Its forthcoming Virginia facility is designed to pivot toward HJT output for utility-scale and commercial buyers, but that manufacturing capability remains prospective as of mid-2026.

For most buyers in 2025 or early 2026, Hyundai is the more reliable default choice: its Tier 1 standing, established production history, and higher-efficiency product range reduce long-term financial and warranty risk. MSolar's domestic manufacturing story is compelling if realized, but without a proven track record or bankability certification, it is better suited to buyers who can tolerate more uncertainty in exchange for potentially lower upfront cost.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-19

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar MSolar
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO MSolar
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar MSolar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 36 Hyundai offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.