Skip to main content

Hiwatt Solar vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hiwatt Solar
Headquarters not published
Read the Hiwatt Solar review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 109 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
109 637
Highest power
730 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 24.8%
Average efficiency
20.6% 22.2%
Bifacial share
13% 36%
Average warranty
25 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hiwatt Solar Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 109 637+528
Max Power 730 W 735 W+5 W
Avg Power 476 W 523 W+47 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.50% 24.80%+1.30 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.60% 22.18%+1.58 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.340%/°C -0.304%/°C+0.036
Bifacial Share 14 (13%) 231 (36%)+23 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Hiwatt Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (46%)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hiwatt Solar is a Chinese PV module manufacturer with a production capacity of approximately 2.2 GW and a portfolio of 109 panels built primarily around PERC cell technology, which accounts for roughly 46% of its lineup. The company does not carry Tier 1 bankable status, which limits its appeal for projects that require third-party financial validation from lenders. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and publicly listed on the NYSE, operates at a fundamentally different scale - it is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers with a production capacity of 130 GW, over 33,800 employees, and Tier 1 bankable status that has been maintained across multiple consecutive years. With 545 panels in its active portfolio and a global installation base exceeding 300 GW, Jinko has a depth of commercial track record that Hiwatt cannot match.

Hiwatt Solar's portfolio delivers a maximum panel output of 730 Wp and a peak module efficiency of 23.5%, with an average efficiency of 20.6% across its range. Its temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C and a modest bifacial share of approximately 12.8% point to a more conventional, cost-oriented offering well suited to standard residential rooftop installs where budget constraints take priority over maximum energy yield. Jinko Solar leads on virtually every technical metric: average module efficiency of 22.0%, maximum efficiency of 24.8%, a more favorable temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C, and a bifacial share approaching 32%. The strong presence of TOPCon technology - covering approximately 39% of its portfolio and underpinned by record-breaking cell efficiency milestones in independent testing - makes Jinko the preferred choice for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial and industrial C&I installations, and high-density residential systems. Its average warranty of approximately 28.5 years, compared to 25 years for Hiwatt, further strengthens its position in projects requiring long-term yield guarantees.

For international buyers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the more credible option across virtually all project types, backed by Tier 1 bankability, superior manufacturing scale, and a technically advanced TOPCon-led portfolio. Hiwatt Solar may serve as a cost-competitive alternative for smaller residential projects or price-sensitive markets where lender bankability requirements do not apply, but the gap in technology leadership, warranty terms, and market standing between the two manufacturers is substantial.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hiwatt Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Hiwatt Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Hiwatt Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.