Skip to main content

Gokin vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Gokin
Headquarters not published
Read the Gokin review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 44 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
44 340
Highest power
780 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
24.5% 24.8%
Average efficiency
23.6% 21.7%
Bifacial share
11% 43%
Average warranty
30 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Gokin Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 44 340+296
Max Power 780 W+20 W 760 W
Avg Power 517 W 520 W+3 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.50% 24.80%+0.30 pp
Avg Efficiency 23.58%+1.86 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.260%/°C+0.042 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 5 (11%) 145 (43%)+31 pp
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+1.8 yr 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Gokin skews to higher efficiency: 82% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)

Gokin cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (100%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Gokin Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturer headquartered in Guangzhou, founded in 2019. Despite its short operating history, it has grown rapidly, ranking 17th in global module shipments according to Solarbe's 2025 rankings and reaching 10th place in the PVBL Global Top 20 PV Brands list. Its formal BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation has not been publicly confirmed in the same way as established industry leaders, though the company positions itself as a key supplier to the Tier-1 project market. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, and is one of the most institutionally entrenched manufacturers in the world. It has held consecutive BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for many years, surpassed 225 GW in cumulative module shipments by early 2025, and operates at an annual production capacity of approximately 95 GW. On the dimension of bankability and institutional track record, Trina Solar holds a clear advantage.

Gokin Solar has differentiated itself through Back Contact (BC) cell technology, being one of only three companies globally to achieve mass production of BC modules. Its product lineup spans several series - including all-black premium modules aimed at the European residential segment, standard commercial rooftop panels, and high-wattage dual-glass modules of up to 700-780 W for utility-scale and C&I ground-mount projects, with declared efficiencies reaching 24.8%. The company has been actively expanding its European distribution, including partnerships in Spain, Germany, and Italy. Trina Solar centers its portfolio on N-type TOPCon technology through the Vertex series - the Vertex S+ reaches efficiencies of up to 22.5%, while the Vertex N line employs the company's proprietary TOPCon Ultra technology. Trina distributes across 160-plus countries and backs n-type modules with a 30-year linear power warranty and annual degradation capped at 0.45%, with 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer.

For most international buyers - whether sourcing for residential rooftops, commercial buildings, or utility-scale projects - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default, given its verified bankability, global service network, and depth of independent performance data. Gokin Solar is a credible and technically innovative option, particularly for buyers drawn to BC technology and premium all-black aesthetics, but it is still establishing the institutional track record that financiers and independent power producers typically require. The two brands are not interchangeable for buyers where supplier maturity is a key criterion.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-27

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Gokin A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Gokin AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
Gokin AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 7 Gokin offers · See 238 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.