Skip to main content

Gintech vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Gintech
Taiwan Founded 2005
Read the Gintech review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 7 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
7 89
Highest power
365 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
18.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
16.6% 21.2%
Bifacial share
0% 39%
Average warranty
25 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Gintech

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese manufacturer of crystalline silicon solar cells and modules, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Zhunan, Hsinchu Science Park. The company produced mono- and multi-crystalline solar cells under its Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix product lines. In January 2018, Gintech merged...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Zhunan (Hsinchu Science Park), Taiwan
Employees
1000-2000
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Gintech Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 7 89+82
Max Power 365 W 675 W+310 W
Avg Power 281 W 468 W+187 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 18.80% 23.20%+4.40 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.61% 21.21%+4.60 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.416%/°C -0.325%/°C+0.091
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 35 (39%)+39 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.0 yrs+2.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Gintech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (29%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Gintech is a Taiwanese solar manufacturer founded in 2005, originally focused on crystalline silicon cell production. The brand's independent existence effectively ended in October 2018, when Gintech merged with Neo Solar Power and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy Co. (URECO), now the largest integrated module and system provider in Taiwan. As a standalone label, Gintech does not appear on current Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 lists and carries a limited institutional footprint internationally. Q CELLS traces its roots to a German company founded in Thalheim, Germany, and was acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group in 2012, becoming Hanwha Q CELLS. It holds confirmed Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and ranked third among all solar panel manufacturers in SolarReviews' 2025 rankings. Hanwha Q CELLS operates a total global module production capacity that exceeds 11 GW annually, including a 3.3 GW facility in Cartersville, Georgia - the largest solar manufacturing complex in the Western Hemisphere. On institutional footprint, Q CELLS is the considerably stronger of the two.

The Gintech product range, to the extent panels still ship under that label, has historically covered standard monocrystalline PERC modules aimed at budget-oriented commercial and small residential rooftop applications, primarily in the Asia-Pacific region. URECO, its successor entity, now markets PERC and N-type bifacial modules under the URE brand in markets like the United States and Australia. Q CELLS, by contrast, offers a broad lineup spanning residential rooftop systems, commercial installations, and utility-scale ground mounts. Its Q.ANTUM NEO series is built on TOPCon cell technology and achieves efficiencies of up to 22.5%, while its temperature coefficient - as low as -0.29%/degree C - is among the best in class for performance in hot climates.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q CELLS is the clear default. It delivers confirmed Tier 1 bankability, a 25-year product warranty, strong independent review scores, widely available installer support in North America and Europe, and competitive pricing roughly 15-20% below premium brands such as Maxeon. Gintech as a standalone brand is essentially a legacy name at this point; buyers in markets where URE modules are available can consider that successor brand for budget-conscious projects, but it does not match Q CELLS on warranty backing, technology generation, or global institutional credibility.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Gintech A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Gintech AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
Gintech AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.