Skip to main content

Gintech vs JA Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Gintech
Taiwan Founded 2005
Read the Gintech review
VS
JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 7 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
7 504
Highest power
365 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
18.8% 24.8%
Average efficiency
16.6% 21.1%
Bifacial share
0% 47%
Average warranty
25 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Gintech

Gintech Energy Corporation was a Taiwanese manufacturer of crystalline silicon solar cells and modules, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Zhunan, Hsinchu Science Park. The company produced mono- and multi-crystalline solar cells under its Diamond, Douro, and Phoenix product lines. In January 2018, Gintech merged...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Zhunan (Hsinchu Science Park), Taiwan
Employees
1000-2000
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Gintech JA Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 7 504+497
Max Power 365 W 740 W+375 W
Avg Power 281 W 456 W+175 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 18.80% 24.80%+6.00 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.61% 21.13%+4.52 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.416%/°C -0.322%/°C+0.094
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 238 (47%)+47 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.9 yrs+2.9 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

Gintech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (29%)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Gintech and JA Solar share a founding year of 2005, but their current market positions could not be more different. Gintech, headquartered in Taiwan, effectively ceased to exist as an independent manufacturer in October 2018, when it merged with Neo Solar Power and Solartech Energy to form United Renewable Energy Co. (URECO). This consolidation is reflected directly in the data: the Gintech brand currently carries zero active panel models in its portfolio. JA Solar, by contrast, is one of the largest solar manufacturers in the world, headquartered in China, employing over 37,000 people, with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW and confirmed Tier 1 bankability. The company is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and maintains an active portfolio of 524 panel models, with a maximum output of 740 Wp and peak efficiency reaching 24.4%, placing it among the top performers in its class.

From a technology standpoint, JA Solar's portfolio is dominated by PERC cell technology (over 52% of models), while its newer Deep Blue 4.0 series introduces TOPCon cells with efficiencies in the 21.8%-23% range. Average portfolio efficiency sits at approximately 20.9%, with an average temperature coefficient of -0.32%/°C - competitive across all application segments. Roughly 44% of models are bifacial, making JA Solar a capable supplier for utility-scale ground-mount projects where rear-side gain adds meaningful yield. The average warranty duration of nearly 28 years exceeds the standard 25-year industry baseline. For residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large ground-mount farms, JA Solar offers a validated, bankable product at competitive price points, consistently rated among the top two global brands by independent reviewer platforms in 2025.

For any international buyer comparing these two manufacturers, Gintech is not a viable option in its current form - there are no active products, no manufacturer support, and no supply chain under that brand name. Buyers interested in Taiwanese-origin technology should instead evaluate URECO (United Renewable Energy), the direct corporate successor. JA Solar, meanwhile, remains a strong default choice for buyers prioritizing Tier 1 bankability, broad portfolio range, and proven field performance across all installation types and scales.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Gintech A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar JA Solar
Manufacturers
Gintech AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO JA Solar
Manufacturers
Gintech AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar JA Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 393 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.