Easun Power vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 2 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
EASUN Power, founded in 2006, specializes in solar inverters and battery storage solutions. With nearly two decades of expertise, they are dedicated to delivering efficient and reliable energy solutions for residential, commercial, and off-grid applications. The company aims to provide affordable and innovative solar...
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shenzhen, China
- Employees
- 51-100
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+
Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)
The flagships
Written summary
Easun Power is a Chinese company headquartered in Shenzhen, founded in 2012, whose core business is solar inverters, charge controllers, and lithium battery systems rather than the manufacture of solar PV modules at industrial scale. It does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list, meaning it does not meet the bankability criteria required by most project financiers. Trina Solar - headquartered in Changzhou, China - operates at an entirely different level: it is one of the world's largest solar manufacturers, consistently recognized as a BNEF Tier 1 PV module producer, a status it reconfirmed in Q1 2025. In 2024 Trina Solar shipped approximately 77 GW of modules, ranking it joint third globally alongside JA Solar. In terms of institutional credibility and manufacturing scale, there is no meaningful comparison between the two brands.
Easun Power's addressable market is limited to off-grid and small hybrid applications - residential backup systems, remote cabins, and small commercial sites that lack reliable grid access. Its inverters and charge controllers appeal primarily to DIY installers attracted by low entry prices, though customer reviews from 2024-2025 highlight recurring concerns about warranty responsiveness and post-sale technical support. Trina Solar, by contrast, offers a complete portfolio spanning every market segment. The Vertex S+ G3 series, built on n-type TOPCon cell technology, targets residential rooftop and small commercial installations with module outputs from 465 W to 495 W and efficiencies reaching 24.3%. A 670 W variant covers C&I ground-mount and large rooftop projects, while the Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra - rated up to 760 W at 24.5% efficiency - is designed for utility-scale PV farms.
For any international buyer evaluating modules for a bankable project - whether a rooftop installer, an EPC contractor, or a project developer - Trina Solar is the clear default. It carries the certifications and track record required by lenders and insurers, maintains an established European distribution network, and backs its products with the institutional weight of a top-three global manufacturer. Easun Power is best understood as a budget inverter and BOS supplier for hobbyist off-grid systems, not as a comparable alternative in the module space.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-29
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 211 Trina Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.