Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD
VS
The verdict
630M-132-BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
450M-96-BD
630M-132-BD
Difference
Module efficiency
22.52 %
23.32 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
450 Wp
630 Wp
180 W more power
Weight
23.0 kg
32.4 kg
9.4 kg lighter
Power density
225.2 Wp/m²
233.2 Wp/m²
8.0 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
35.03 V
49.34 V
14.31 V apart
Module area
1.998 m²
2.701 m²
0.703 m² apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power
30.08 V
41.82 V
11.74 V apart
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
450M-96-BD
15,098 kWh
630M-132-BD
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,040 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
450M-96-BD
630M-132-BD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
450 W
630 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
430 W
603 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
410 W
575 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
389 W
548 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
450M-96-BD
630M-132-BD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
450 Wp
630 Wp
+180 W for 630M-132-BD
Module efficiency
22.52 %
23.32 %
+0.80 pp for 630M-132-BD
Power density
225.2 Wp/m²
233.2 Wp/m²
+8.0 Wp/m² for 630M-132-BD
Open-circuit voltage
35.03 V
49.34 V
14.31 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.08 V
41.82 V
11.74 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.05 A
16.27 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.97 A
15.06 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for 630M-132-BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.701 m²
0.703 m² apart
Weight
23.0 kg
32.4 kg
-9.4 kg for 450M-96-BD
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,108
vs
#973
630M-132-BD leads by 3,135 places
Power density
#4,225
vs
#1,003
630M-132-BD leads by 3,222 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#2,165
630M-132-BD leads by 3,928 places
Weight
#4,436
vs
#4,804
450M-96-BD leads by 368 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,408
vs
#1,630
630M-132-BD leads by 6,778 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-460M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-620M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD or Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has higher module efficiency (23.32% vs 22.52%); Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a module efficiency of 22.52%, while Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD is 23.32%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD use vs Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD uses TOPCon cells; Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solarever offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.