Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD
VS
The verdict
Identical on every published parameter
All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.
How alike are they
19
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
0 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
630M-132-BD
21,138 kWh
625M-132-BD
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
630M-132-BD
625M-132-BD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
630 W
625 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
603 W
598 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
575 W
571 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
548 W
543 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
630M-132-BD
625M-132-BD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
630 Wp
625 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.32 %
23.13 %
Effectively the same
Power density
233.2 Wp/m²
231.4 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.34 V
49.19 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.82 V
41.69 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.27 A
16.19 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.06 A
14.99 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.4 kg
32.4 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#973
vs
#1,563
630M-132-BD leads by 590 places
Power density
#1,003
vs
#1,513
630M-132-BD leads by 510 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,804
vs
#5,218
630M-132-BD leads by 414 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,630
vs
#1,833
630M-132-BD leads by 203 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-620M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-615M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-600M-132-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD or Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has higher module efficiency (23.32% vs 23.13%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has a module efficiency of 23.32%, while Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD is 23.13%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD use vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD uses TOPCon cells; Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solarever offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.