Pylontech Force H2 (FH9637M) vs FoxESS HS12.5
VS
The verdict
HS12.5 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is usable energy: 0.88 kWh apart. 2 of 11 comparable parameters are identical, with 22 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 11 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
9 of 11 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
Force H2 (FH9637M)
HS12.5
Difference
Usable energy
12.79 kWh
11.91 kWh
0.88 kWh apart
Nominal energy
14.21 kWh
12.28 kWh
1.93 kWh apart
Nominal voltage
384 V
256 V
128 V apart
Min operating temperature
0 °C
-10 °C
10 °C more cold tolerant
Cycle test depth
90 %
80 %
10 pp apart
Max operating temperature
50 °C
55 °C
5 °C more heat tolerant
Ingress protection
IP55
IP21
IP55 vs IP21
Modules per stack
2-7
2-8
2-7 vs 2-8
Operating voltage
96-384 V
216-292 V
96-384 V vs 216-292 V
02
4 shops we track
Price offers
Shop
Force H2 (FH9637M)
HS12.5
At this shop
Shop prices by brand: See 103 Pylontech offers · See 31 FoxESS offers
03
Full specification
Parameter
Force H2 (FH9637M)
HS12.5
Difference
Capacity
Usable energy
12.79 kWh
11.91 kWh
0.88 kWh apart
Nominal energy
14.21 kWh
12.28 kWh
1.93 kWh apart
Depth of discharge
90 %
-
Not published by FoxESS
Max system capacity
-
19.6 kWh
Not published by Pylontech
Modules per stack
2-7
2-8
2-7 vs 2-8
Power
Continuous discharge power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Continuous charge power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Peak discharge power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Power per kWh
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Efficiency and lifetime
Round-trip efficiency
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Cycle life
-
6000 cycles
Not published by Pylontech
Cycle test depth
90 %
80 %
10 pp apart
Capacity at end of life
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Self-discharge
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Electrical
Voltage class
High voltage
High voltage
Same
Nominal voltage
384 V
256 V
128 V apart
Operating voltage
96-384 V
216-292 V
96-384 V vs 216-292 V
Cell chemistry
-
LFP
Not published by Pylontech
Active cell balancing
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Thermal management
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Built-in inverter
Inverter
None (battery only)
None (battery only)
Same
Inverter power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Grid connection
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Backup power
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Physical
Weight
155.0 kg
-
Not published by FoxESS
Weight per kWh
12.1 kg/kWh
-
Not published by FoxESS
Dimensions
1415x450x296 mm
-
Not published by FoxESS
Ingress protection
IP55
IP21
IP55 vs IP21
Outdoor-rated
Yes
-
Not published by FoxESS
Min operating temperature
0 °C
-10 °C
-10 °C for HS12.5
Max operating temperature
50 °C
55 °C
+5 °C for HS12.5
Warranty
Warranty
-
10 yrs
Not published by Pylontech
Warranted throughput
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
04
Open all batteries
More useful comparisons
Similar capacity
Pylontech Force H2 (FH9637M) vs BYD Battery-Box Premium HVS 12.8
10 differences, the largest is nominal energy
Similar capacity
Pylontech Force H2 (FH9637M) vs FoxESS ECS2900-H5
10 differences, the largest is usable energy
Similar capacity
Pylontech Force H2 (FH9637M) vs SMA Home Storage 13.1
10 differences, the largest is usable energy
Similar capacity
FoxESS HS12.5 vs Solplanet Ai-HB 125A
8 differences, the largest is usable energy
Similar capacity
FoxESS HS12.5 vs FoxESS ECS4300H-H3
9 differences, the largest is usable energy
Similar capacity
FoxESS HS12.5 vs Pylontech Force H1 (5 modules)
7 differences, the largest is usable energy
05
Written summary
Checking cache...
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate.
