Clelo Tech vs AIKO - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
Clelo Tech
China · est. 2017AIKO
China · est. 2009
Panel models
7
vs
144
Max power
720 W
vs
805 W
Max efficiency
23.20%
vs
25.20%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
24%
At a glance
AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 7 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Clelo Tech leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Clelo Tech
Website
Jiangsu Clelo Material Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese solar manufacturer and system integrator based in Changshu, Suzhou, specializing in photovoltaic panels, BIPV technology, and complete PV power plant solutions. The company offers products and turnkey systems ranging from small residential installations to...
Headquarters
Changshu, China
Founded
2017
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
AIKO
Website
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Founded
2009
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
Clelo Tech
|
AIKO
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 7 | 144 +137 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 805 W +85 W |
| Avg Power | 705 W +124 W | 581 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 25.20% +2.00 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.70% | 23.65% +0.95 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C +0.031 | -0.271%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 7 (100%) +76 pp | 35 (24%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +0.5 yr | 29.5 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandClelo Tech
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JT720SLkB Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | JT715SLkB Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | JT710SLkB Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | JT705SLkB Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | JT700SLkB Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | JT695SLkB Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | JT690SLkB Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
AIKO
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw Bi | 805W | 25.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw Bi | 800W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw Bi | 795W | 24.8% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw Bi | 790W | 24.6% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw Bi | 785W | 24.4% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw Bi | 780W | 24.3% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw Bi | 775W | 24.1% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw Bi | 770W | 24.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw | 700W | 25.0% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw | 695W | 24.9% | -0.260%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 7 panels average
Efficiency
22.70%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
24.61%
Temp coeff
-0.260%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Clelo Tech offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Clelo Tech Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
AIKO Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: Back Contact (74%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.