Skip to main content

BYD vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

BYD
China Founded 1995 Tier 1
Read the BYD review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 115 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. BYD leans bifacial (95% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
115 340
Highest power
735 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
23.7% 24.8%
Average efficiency
21.8% 21.7%
Bifacial share
95% 43%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
BYD
Founded
1995
Headquarters
Shenzhen, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric BYD Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 115 340+225
Max Power 735 W 760 W+25 W
Avg Power 565 W+45 W 520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.66% 24.80%+1.14 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.84%+0.13 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.299%/°C+0.002 -0.302%/°C
Bifacial Share 109 (95%)+52 pp 145 (43%)
Avg Warranty 28.5 yrs+0.3 yr 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

BYD offers more 600W+ panels (41% of lineup)

BYD cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (63%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

BYD is a Chinese conglomerate headquartered in Shenzhen, founded in 1994 as a battery manufacturer before entering the solar industry in 2009. Trina Solar was established in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, and has been a dedicated photovoltaic manufacturer since its inception. Trina Solar holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status as of Q2 2025 - its eighth consecutive year achieving a 100% rating from all BNEF respondents - and has shipped more than 292 GW of modules globally. BYD appears on some industry Tier 1 listings, but its bankability standing is less consistently documented than Trina's, partly because solar is one division among many in a group whose primary identity is built around electric vehicles and energy storage. On institutional credibility and the sheer scale of solar-specific shipments, Trina Solar holds a clearly stronger footprint.

BYD's module range covers residential rooftops through utility-scale ground mounts, with power outputs spanning roughly 380 W to 730 W and cell technology options that include N-type TOPCon, HJT, and bifacial configurations. The brand is generally positioned as a value-oriented alternative, priced approximately 10-15% below premium-tier competitors, though its standard product warranty terms have drawn criticism for falling short of the 25-year benchmark offered by leading Chinese peers. Trina Solar structures its portfolio around two principal families: the Vertex S+ aimed at residential and smaller commercial rooftops, and the Vertex N for C&I and utility-scale applications. Both lines are built on N-type TOPCon cells, with the flagship Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra modules reaching up to 760 W output and 24.5% efficiency, as reported by pv-magazine in December 2024. Trina Solar has earned TOP Performer recognition from Kiwa PVEL for eleven consecutive years, reinforcing its long-term reliability credentials.

For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer, a C&I developer, or a utility-scale project sponsor - Trina Solar is the stronger default choice, backed by a decade-plus of bankability data, a broad certified product lineup, and warranty terms that satisfy most lender requirements. BYD remains a credible option for cost-sensitive projects in markets where its distribution network is well established, such as Brazil, or where budget constraints outweigh the need for institutional grade documentation. In financed utility or commercial projects where lender due diligence is rigorous, Trina's BNEF track record gives it a meaningful edge.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
BYD A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
BYD AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
BYD AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.