ASM vs Solarspace - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
ASM
Australia · est. 2009Solarspace
China · est. 2011
Panel models
0
vs
82
Max power
0 W
vs
710 W
Max efficiency
-
vs
23.16%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
93%
At a glance
Solarspace has the broader catalog (82 vs 0 models). Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).
ASM
Website
Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...
Headquarters
Hallam, Victoria, Australia
Founded
2009
Employees
1-10
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
Solarspace
Website
SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...
Headquarters
Xuzhou, China
Founded
2011
Employees
6000+
Production Capacity
60+ GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
ASM
|
Solarspace
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 0 | 82 +82 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 710 W +710 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 539 W +539 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.16% |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.04% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.299%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 76 (93%) +93 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.6 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandASM
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No panel data available. | |||||
Solarspace
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SS9-66HD-710N Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SS9-66HD-705N Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SS9-66HD-700N Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | SS9-66HD-695N Bi | 695W | 22.4% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | SS9-66HD-690N Bi | 690W | 22.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | SS9-66HD-685N Bi | 685W | 22.1% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | SS9-66HD-680N Bi | 680W | 21.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | SS9-66HD-675N Bi | 675W | 21.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | SS9-66HD-670N Bi | 670W | 21.6% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | SS9-66HD-670M Bi | 670W | 21.6% | -0.330%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 0 panels average
Efficiency
-
Temp coeff
-
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.15%
Temp coeff
-0.294%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Solarspace skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)
ASM Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Solarspace Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: N-type (70%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.