Skip to main content

ASM vs Solarspace - solar panel manufacturer comparison

ASM
Australia Founded 2009
Read the ASM review
VS
Solarspace
China Founded 2011 Tier 1
Read the Solarspace review
At a glance

Solarspace has the broader catalog (82 vs 1 models). Solarspace leads on peak efficiency at 23.16%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
1 82
Highest power
170 Wp 710 Wp
Best efficiency
16.0% 23.2%
Average efficiency
16.0% 22.0%
Bifacial share
0% 93%
Average warranty
- 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
ASM

Australian Solar Manufacturing (ASM) is a small Australian solar panel assembler that produces crystalline monocrystalline modules domestically using components sourced from Germany, Japan, the USA, and China. The company focuses on providing locally assembled PV modules tailored to Australian conditions, supporting...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Hallam, Victoria, Australia
Employees
1-10
Solarspace

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...

Founded
2011
Headquarters
Xuzhou, China
Annual capacity
60+ GW/year
Employees
6000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric ASM Solarspace
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 1 82+81
Max Power 170 W 710 W+540 W
Avg Power 170 W 539 W+369 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 16.00% 23.16%+7.16 pp
Avg Efficiency 16.00% 22.04%+6.04 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.438%/°C -0.299%/°C+0.139
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 76 (93%)+93 pp
Avg Warranty - 29.6 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Solarspace skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Solarspace offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)

ASM cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Solarspace cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (70%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

ASM is a brand name for which my targeted web searches returned no usable results as an active solar panel manufacturer. The name appears in industry records primarily as a subsidiary of ASM Pacific Technology that supplied cell metallization equipment rather than finished modules, and separately as an unrelated Australian commercial installer. Without verified public data on ASM's headquarters, founding date, production scale, or certification status, any characterization of the brand as a module supplier would be speculative rather than factual.

Solarspace, by contrast, is a well-documented Chinese manufacturer founded in 2011, with production facilities spanning China, Cambodia, and Laos. BloombergNEF has repeatedly recognized Solarspace on its Tier 1 bankability list, confirming the company's demonstrated ability to supply projects financed by independent commercial banks. PV InfoLink ranked Solarspace second globally in solar cell shipments in the first half of 2025, and by the end of 2023 the company had expanded cell production capacity to roughly 60 GW and module output capacity to around 7.2 GW. That scale and bankability standing give Solarspace a substantial institutional footprint relative to most mid-tier peers.

Solarspace's product portfolio spans multiple segments and cell technologies. The Lumina I series uses PERC technology for cost-conscious commercial and residential buyers, while the company's TOPCon modules reach top efficiencies confirmed above 22 percent. At RE+ 2025 Solarspace also unveiled HJT panels under its Lumina II line, targeting customers who want premium performance. For a buyer evaluating these two brands in 2025, Solarspace is the verifiable choice - it carries confirmed Tier 1 status, a documented global production footprint, and a broadening technology portfolio. ASM, as currently resolvable through public research, cannot be recommended as a panel supplier until its identity in that role is independently confirmed.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
ASM A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Solarspace
Manufacturers
ASM AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Solarspace
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Solarspace
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 5 Solarspace offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.