Skip to main content

AmoSolar vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AmoSolar
Headquarters not published
Read the AmoSolar review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 77 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%.

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
77 144
Highest power
675 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
22.8% 25.2%
Average efficiency
21.1% 23.7%
Bifacial share
22% 24%
Average warranty
26 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AmoSolar AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 77 144+67
Max Power 675 W 805 W+130 W
Avg Power 522 W 581 W+60 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.83% 25.20%+2.37 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.14% 23.65%+2.51 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.339%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.068
Bifacial Share 17 (22%) 35 (24%)+2 pp
Avg Warranty 26.5 yrs 29.5 yrs+3.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)

AmoSolar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (86%)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AmoSolar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2008 and headquartered in Hefei, Anhui Province. The company operates roughly 3 GW of annual production capacity across four manufacturing bases and holds a portfolio of certifications including IEC and TUV. AmoSolar has been recognized by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology as a National Technology-oriented SME, but no evidence of BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status appeared in available sources. AIKO Solar - formally Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. - was founded around 2009 and operates a substantially larger manufacturing footprint spanning multiple gigafactories in Yiwu, Foshan, Zhuhai, and Jinan, with reported cell production capacity exceeding 20 GW. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and maintains an R&D center in Freiburg, Germany. On institutional footprint, AIKO is clearly the larger and more bankable entity.

Product-wise, AmoSolar covers a broad spectrum including N-type TOPCon and HJT modules alongside more conventional offerings, targeting residential, commercial, and small utility segments with wattages reportedly ranging from around 410 W to 735 W. AIKO's entire portfolio is built around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type cell technology, which positions all electrical contacts on the rear of the cell to maximize light capture. AIKO panels have topped the Taiyangnews global module efficiency rankings consistently since March 2023, with cell efficiencies reported above 27% in mass production - figures corroborated by multiple independent review sources. The brand's 30-year performance warranty with a stated degradation floor of 88.85% residual output reflects strong confidence in long-term durability.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO represents the higher-performance and better-bankability option, making it more suitable for premium residential rooftops and projects requiring third-party-financed procurement. AmoSolar is a credible secondary-tier manufacturer with a solid certification record and competitive pricing, better suited to cost-sensitive commercial or off-grid applications where top-of-market efficiency is not a priority. The two brands are not interchangeable - AIKO carries a meaningfully stronger technological and institutional standing.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AmoSolar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
AmoSolar AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
AmoSolar ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 174 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.