Skip to main content

AKCOME vs Viessmann - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
Viessmann
Germany Founded 1917
Read the Viessmann review
At a glance

Viessmann has the broader catalog (11 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 11
Highest power
700 Wp 405 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% 21.3%
Average efficiency
21.6% 19.4%
Bifacial share
100% 0%
Average warranty
30 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Viessmann
Founded
1917
Headquarters
Allendorf, Germany
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME Viessmann
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3 11+8
Max Power 700 W+295 W 405 W
Avg Power 672 W+311 W 361 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54%+1.24 pp 21.30%
Avg Efficiency 21.63%+2.22 pp 19.41%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C+0.122 -0.362%/°C
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+100 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+5.0 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

Viessmann cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AKCOME is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, founded in the mid-2000s and focused primarily on solar modules and mounting systems. At its peak the company reported an annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW and appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists through early 2024. However, its position has since collapsed: a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024 after reporting substantial net losses every year since 2019, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange terminated AKCOME's listing in August 2024. Viessmann, by contrast, is a German climate-technology group founded in 1917, now operating as Viessmann Climate Solutions under Carrier Global Corporation. Its photovoltaic business is a smaller, integrated part of a much larger heating and energy portfolio, and while it holds the EUPD Top Brand PV seal in Germany, it does not appear on BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer lists as a volume producer. On institutional footprint and financial stability, Viessmann today is the substantially stronger choice.

The two manufacturers serve different use cases and market segments. AKCOME built its volume around mainstream mono-crystalline modules aimed at commercial and utility-scale projects, and search results confirm high-wattage modules (in the 655-700 W range) as part of its catalog. Viessmann's photovoltaic offering centers on its Vitovolt residential product family - most notably the Vitovolt 300 and the newer Vitovolt 300-DG, the latter using bifacial N-type TOPCon double-glass cell technology - designed to integrate seamlessly with the company's heat pumps, inverters, and energy storage systems. Viessmann's approach is thus best described as a premium whole-home energy system for European residential buyers rather than a standalone high-volume module supplier.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Viessmann is the more sensible default if the installation is residential, European, and benefits from bundled heat-pump or storage integration. AKCOME's financial collapse makes it an impractical option regardless of panel specifications, as long-term warranty support and supply continuity are genuinely uncertain. Buyers who previously specified AKCOME for cost-driven commercial projects should treat the brand as effectively unavailable and source from an active BloombergNEF Tier 1 manufacturer instead.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-22

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Viessmann
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Viessmann
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Viessmann
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers · See 5 Viessmann offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.