Skip to main content

AKCOME vs TN Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
TN Solar
Headquarters not published
Read the TN Solar review
At a glance

TN Solar has the broader catalog (10 vs 3 models). TN Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.02%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 10
Highest power
700 Wp 715 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% 23.0%
Average efficiency
21.6% 21.1%
Bifacial share
100% 50%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME TN Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3 10+7
Max Power 700 W 715 W+15 W
Avg Power 672 W+129 W 542 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54% 23.02%+0.48 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.63%+0.54 pp 21.08%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C+0.040 -0.280%/°C
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+50 pp 5 (50%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs 30.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

TN Solar skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

TN Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (50%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

TN Solar Co., Limited is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in China and founded in 2006, positioning itself as a vertically integrated producer covering silicon ingot, wafer, cell, and module assembly. The company operates a relatively modest production footprint - ENF Solar records indicate a handful of production lines - and its Tier 1 claims appear to be self-described rather than confirmed by BloombergNEF or independent bankability assessors. Independent third-party reviews are sparse, and the brand is largely absent from major industry tracking publications. AKCOME (Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.), also founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2010, built a substantially larger institutional profile, reaching an estimated 3.8 GW of annual module production capacity and achieving verified BloombergNEF Tier 1 status at least through 2022. On institutional footprint, AKCOME historically held the stronger position - though that standing is now deeply complicated by its financial situation.

AKCOME differentiated itself through an early commitment to HJT (heterojunction) cell technology alongside a TOPCon lineup, targeting both residential and commercial rooftop segments across more than 30 countries, with a notable presence in Australia. TN Solar's catalog spans a wide power range from compact 20-200 W specialty panels to standard 400-755 W modules in PERC, TOPCon, and HJT variants, positioning the brand primarily toward budget commercial and OEM private-label buyers rather than premium or utility-scale demand. Neither brand is associated with large utility-scale ground-mount project pipelines in the way the top-five Chinese module giants are.

For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand represents a straightforward recommendation. AKCOME's subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in August 2024, and was dropped from TaiyangNews top module tracking in January 2025 - introducing serious warranty continuity and after-sales support risk. TN Solar, while apparently operational, lacks the independent review record and bankability documentation that lenders and large project developers require. Buyers prioritizing supply-chain certainty should look toward better-documented Tier 1 alternatives in 2025.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-23

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar TN Solar
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO TN Solar
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM TN Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.