AKCOME vs Powitt Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province, founded in 2006 and formerly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange before its 2024 delisting following sustained net losses. It has historically held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status but was reportedly dropped from the tracking list in early 2025 after its corporate website became inaccessible, raising questions about its current bankability. Its manufacturing footprint spans facilities in Suzhou and Ganzhou, with module capacity cited around 3.8 GW alongside plans for an 8.8 GW N-type cell base at Changxing, and the company says it operates in over 30 countries with more than 6,000 employees. Powitt Solar, also based in Jiangsu (Changzhou, with a production base in Wuxi), was founded around 2010 and describes a smaller annual capacity near 1 GW, with over 5 GW cumulatively supplied and a presence extending to Sri Lanka and Australia. On institutional footprint, AKCOME is the larger and more established entity by scale and public-market history, though its recent financial troubles and Tier 1 uncertainty complicate that advantage over the more modest but seemingly stable Powitt.

Product-wise, AKCOME's lineup splits into the AK iPower HJT series and AK iTopper TOPCon series, explicitly targeting three segments - residential rooftops, commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and large ground-mounted utility power stations - giving it one of the broader technology spreads (both heterojunction and TOPCon) among mid-size Chinese manufacturers. Powitt Solar's portfolio leans toward N-type TOPCon bifacial modules in the roughly 580-730 W range, positioned for commercial and utility-scale projects, with panels commonly paired with long, 30-year product warranties, suggesting a narrower but higher-power, efficiency-focused catalog rather than AKCOME's multi-technology, multi-segment approach.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice depends on priorities: AKCOME offers technological breadth (HJT and TOPCon) and a longer track record, but its 2024 delisting and Tier 1 list uncertainty warrant due diligence on current financial bankability before large installations. Powitt Solar, while smaller in scale and less independently reviewed, presents a more focused high-efficiency, bifacial TOPCon offering with strong warranty terms that may suit commercial or utility buyers prioritizing per-panel output. Neither brand is as extensively covered by independent third-party testing as top-tier names like JinkoSolar or Trina Solar, so buyers should request current financial and certification documentation directly from either manufacturer before committing to large-scale projects.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-30