Skip to main content

AKCOME vs Jinergy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
Jinergy
China Founded 2014
Read the Jinergy review
At a glance

Jinergy has the broader catalog (10 vs 3 models). Jinergy leads on peak efficiency at 23.27%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 10
Highest power
700 Wp 510 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% 23.3%
Average efficiency
21.6% 21.9%
Bifacial share
100% 50%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Jinergy
Founded
2014
Headquarters
China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME Jinergy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3 10+7
Max Power 700 W+190 W 510 W
Avg Power 672 W+194 W 478 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54% 23.27%+0.73 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.63% 21.93%+0.31 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C+0.090 -0.330%/°C
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+50 pp 5 (50%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs 30.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinergy skews to higher efficiency: 20% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

Jinergy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (50%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AKCOME is a Chinese solar manufacturer, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd, founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2010. It has appeared on Bloomberg New Energy Finance's Tier 1 list, reflecting recognized bankability, though some trackers noted a temporary delisting in early 2025 tied to website accessibility issues rather than financial distress. Reported module production capacity has varied by source and period, with recent figures around 3.8 GW per year, down from a peak near 9 GW in 2022. Jinergy, formally Jinneng Clean Energy Technology Ltd, is headquartered in Jinzhong, Shanxi Province, China, and was also named a BNEF Tier 1 PV module supplier. Jinergy built one of China's earliest commercial heterojunction (HJT) production lines, launched in 2017, and has historically been sized in the low single-digit GW range, though current annual capacity figures were not confirmed in available sources. Between the two, AKCOME appears to carry the broader institutional footprint, given its longer public-market history and larger historical manufacturing scale.

AKCOME's product lineup centers on N-type technology across two main series: the AK iPower line built on HJT cells and the AK iTopper line built on TOPCon cells, both marketed for residential, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount installations. Jinergy has staked its identity specifically on heterojunction technology, being one of the first Chinese manufacturers to commercialize HJT modules, with bifacial HJT panels reporting cell efficiencies above 23-24% in company and certification data; its modules are typically positioned for premium residential and commercial rooftops as well as utility projects where the bifacial gain and strong temperature coefficient of HJT are valued.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice largely comes down to how much weight is placed on manufacturing scale and continuity of Tier 1 tracking versus specialized HJT engineering pedigree. AKCOME's larger historical footprint and dual TOPCon/HJT lineup make it a reasonably safe generalist choice, while Jinergy is a credible option for buyers specifically prioritizing HJT performance characteristics, though its more modest disclosed scale warrants closer due diligence on current supply stability. Neither brand carries the global name recognition of top-tier giants like JinkoSolar or LONGi, so buyers of either should verify current Tier 1 status and local distributor support before purchase.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-17

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinergy
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinergy
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Jinergy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers · See 4 Jinergy offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.