AKCOME vs Hansol - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Hansol has the broader catalog (22 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Hansol Group is a South Korean conglomerate (chaebol) with core operations in paper manufacturing, chemicals, logistics, IT solutions, and home decoration. The group was founded in 1965 and separated from Samsung Group in 1991. Hansol operates through a network of subsidiaries emphasizing innovation and sustainability.
- Founded
- 1965
- Headquarters
- Seoul, South Korea
- Annual capacity
- 0-1 GW/year
- Employees
- 11,000+
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, founded as part of the broader Akcome Group which spans solar cells, modules, and mounting structures. It holds Tier 1 bankability status according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, and its module manufacturing capacity is reported at approximately 3.8 GW per year, with substantially larger cell capacity expansions announced for coming years. Hansol Solar, a division of Hansol Technics within South Korea's Hansol Group, entered the solar module business around 2010 and operates primarily from a facility in Ochang, South Korea, with a reported annual module capacity in the range of 600 MW or above. Hansol Technics appeared on Tier 1 lists as recently as 2019, but its more recent bankability standing is less clearly confirmed in current industry sources. In terms of sheer manufacturing scale and institutional financing track record, AKCOME carries the heavier footprint.
On the technology side, AKCOME has positioned itself as an HJT and TOPCon specialist, marketing high-power bifacial modules - its flagship HJT line has reached outputs as high as 730 W - which makes it most relevant for utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount applications where high wattage and bifacial gain matter most. Hansol's publicly visible product catalog, as reflected on platforms like EnergySage, has historically featured lower-wattage residential and light commercial modules, and the company recently restructured its solar module operations into a dedicated subsidiary, suggesting the product line may be in transition. No confirmed shift to TOPCon or HJT for Hansol's current mainstream catalog could be found in available sources.
For a typical buyer in 2025, AKCOME is the more scalable and technologically current choice for commercial or utility-scale procurement, provided supply chain continuity concerns - including a brief period when its website became inaccessible flagged by industry trackers in early 2025 - are due-diligenced. Hansol may appeal to buyers in South Korea or nearby markets who prioritize locally manufactured product and closer manufacturer relationships for residential installations, but it is the smaller and less internationally prominent of the two.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-19
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.