Skip to main content

AKCOME vs FoxESS - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
FoxESS
China Founded 2019 Tier 1
Read the FoxESS review
At a glance

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 0
Highest power
700 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% -
Average efficiency
21.6% -
Bifacial share
100% 0%
Average warranty
30 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
FoxESS

FoxESS is a global leader in inverter and energy storage solutions, backed by the Fortune Global 500 Tsingshan Group. The company specializes in hybrid inverters, lithium battery storage systems, and smart energy management platforms for residential and commercial applications. With operations in over 70 countries and...

Founded
2019
Headquarters
Wenzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME FoxESS
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3+3 0
Max Power 700 W+700 W 0 W
Avg Power 672 W+672 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54% -
Avg Efficiency 21.63% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C -
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+100 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

FoxESS cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
FoxESS all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

FoxESS is a Chinese energy-technology company founded in 2019 and headquartered in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province. It operates as a subsidiary of Tsingshan Group, a Fortune Global 500 conglomerate and the world's largest producer of stainless steel, which gives FoxESS substantial financial backing unusual for a brand of its age. The company achieved unicorn status in 2023 after a Series D round of approximately $141 million. Critically, FoxESS is primarily a manufacturer of solar inverters and battery storage systems, not a solar panel producer - its core catalog covers single-phase and three-phase PV inverters, hybrid inverters, lithium battery modules, EV chargers, and heat pumps, with a reported inverter production capacity of 12 GW per year. AKCOME, by contrast, is a dedicated solar module manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu Province. It has been publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2011, employs over 3,500 people, and claims a production capacity of 13.6 GW for high-efficiency cells and modules. AKCOME has posted about achieving BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition; no equivalent Tier 1 panel-maker status could be confirmed for FoxESS given that panels are not its primary product. On institutional footprint as a solar panel supplier, AKCOME stands clearly ahead.

Because FoxESS does not manufacture solar panels as a core product line, comparing the two on module technology is not straightforward. AKCOME has built its identity around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, one of the most advanced commercial cell formats available, and markets the AK iPower series as its flagship HJT offering. The company also produces TOPCon modules under the AK iTopper brand, giving it coverage across the two dominant next-generation cell technologies. Reported mass-production cell efficiencies and bifacial designs position AKCOME toward premium residential rooftops and demanding commercial or utility-scale applications where high energy yield per square meter is a priority. FoxESS, for its part, is best evaluated as a potential inverter or storage partner rather than a panel supplier, and earns solid mid-tier reviews in Australia and Europe for its hybrid inverter and battery ecosystem.

For a buyer specifically sourcing solar panels, AKCOME is the relevant brand to evaluate here - FoxESS simply does not compete in that segment. If the purchasing decision involves a full system including inverter and storage, FoxESS may be worth considering alongside its own inverter lineup, potentially paired with a third-party panel brand. The two are not meaningfully interchangeable because they occupy different product categories within the broader solar supply chain.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar FoxESS
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO FoxESS
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM FoxESS
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.