Skip to main content

AKCOME vs Easun Power - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
Easun Power
China Founded 2006
Read the Easun Power review
At a glance

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 2 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 2
Highest power
700 Wp 200 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% 20.5%
Average efficiency
21.6% 20.1%
Bifacial share
100% 0%
Average warranty
30 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Easun Power

EASUN Power, founded in 2006, specializes in solar inverters and battery storage solutions. With nearly two decades of expertise, they are dedicated to delivering efficient and reliable energy solutions for residential, commercial, and off-grid applications. The company aims to provide affordable and innovative solar...

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shenzhen, China
Employees
51-100
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME Easun Power
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3+1 2
Max Power 700 W+500 W 200 W
Avg Power 672 W+522 W 150 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54%+2.04 pp 20.50%
Avg Efficiency 21.63%+1.56 pp 20.07%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C+0.160 -0.400%/°C
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+100 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

Easun Power cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Both AKCOME and Easun Power are China-based solar manufacturers, though they occupy very different positions in the market. AKCOME, founded in 2003, grew into a gigawatt-scale producer of heterojunction (HJT) modules, announcing a 4.6 GW HJT production base expansion and targeting 8.2 GW of HJT capacity by 2024. Despite this scale, the company lost its BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status in 2024 - in part because Zhejiang Akcome Photoelectricity Technology filed for bankruptcy proceedings that year, raising serious concerns about financial continuity. Easun Power, founded in 2006, is a much smaller operation with 51-100 employees, primarily recognized as a hybrid inverter and off-grid storage brand that sells panels as part of its broader product ecosystem. Neither company currently carries Tier 1 bankable status, which limits their appeal for project finance and utility-scale procurement.

The two lineups could hardly be more different in portfolio character. AKCOME's three analyzed panels are exclusively high-power, 100% bifacial HJT modules averaging 671.7 Wp and peaking at 700 Wp, with an average efficiency of 21.63% and a top figure of 22.54%. Its temperature coefficient averages a very competitive -0.24%/°C, and a 30-year product warranty is standard across the range - a spec sheet that targets utility-scale ground mounts, agrivoltaic installations, and premium large-format commercial projects where bifacial gain and thermal performance matter. Easun Power's two panels, by contrast, average just 150 Wp and top out at 200 Wp, with average efficiency of 20.07% and a noticeably weaker temperature coefficient of -0.40%/°C. All panels in Easun's lineup are monofacial. These are compact, budget panels aimed squarely at small off-grid cabins, caravans, or as companion modules bundled with the company's own inverter products.

For a typical buyer comparing the two in 2025, the choice depends entirely on the application rather than on brand prestige. A residential or commercial installer seeking large-format, high-output bifacial modules should look at AKCOME's HJT lineup, keeping in mind the real financial risk flagged by its loss of Tier 1 status and the bankruptcy proceedings affecting part of its corporate structure - insurance and long-term warranty backing deserve careful due diligence. Easun Power's panels are not a competitor in that space at all; they exist as low-wattage accessories within an inverter-centric product line. Buyers needing compact off-grid panels to pair with an Easun inverter may find them convenient, but should not expect the efficiency, bifacial gain, or warranty depth that AKCOME's flagship modules provide.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-11

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Easun Power
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Easun Power
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Easun Power
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.