AKCOME vs Dyness - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Dyness is a global innovator in energy storage solutions, specializing in battery system integration R&D and manufacturing. They provide lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery solutions for residential, commercial, and industrial applications. Dyness serves over 500,000 users in 100+ countries, partnering with 90+...
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Suzhou, China
- Annual capacity
- 3+ GW/year
- Employees
- 200+
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME (full legal name: Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese solar panel manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Jiangsu Province, China. The company holds an annual PV module production capacity of approximately 3.8 GW and was previously listed on Bloomberg NEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer roster, though it was removed from that list by 2024. AKCOME has a dedicated Australian subsidiary, Akcome Power Pty Ltd, registered since 2014, giving it a notable distribution footprint in the Asia-Pacific residential and commercial market. Dyness (Dyness Digital Energy Technology Co., Ltd.), founded in 2017 and headquartered in Suzhou, China, is emphatically not a solar panel manufacturer - it is a battery energy storage system (BESS) specialist, producing lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) residential and commercial storage units with a reported annual manufacturing capacity of 3 GWh. Dyness holds multiple EUPD Top Brand Storage awards for 2025 across European markets including the UK, Poland, and Romania. On institutional footprint within the solar panel segment specifically, AKCOME is the only one of these two companies that belongs there.
AKCOME's confirmed product families span PERC and HJT module technologies, with panels ranging from entry-level commercial wattages up to approximately 700 W in its higher-end Kookaburra series. This positions the brand primarily at the budget-to-mid-range end of the residential rooftop and small commercial rooftop segments, particularly in Australia and other Asia-Pacific markets. Its HJT-based modules were at one point listed in TaiyangNews top-module rankings but were delisted in early 2025 due to inaccessible product data. Dyness products, by contrast, are complementary to - not competitive with - solar panels: its PowerBox, Tower, and Stack series battery systems are designed to pair with inverters and PV arrays from other manufacturers to provide grid-tied or off-grid storage.
For a buyer specifically seeking solar panels, Dyness is simply not a candidate - the two brands occupy entirely different positions in the solar value chain. AKCOME is the relevant choice for PV modules, best suited to cost-sensitive residential or small commercial rooftop installations, particularly in Australia, where its local subsidiary provides support. Buyers needing battery storage to complement any panel brand, however, would find Dyness a credible and internationally recognized option in the BESS segment.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.