AKCOME vs DAH - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
AKCOME
China · est. 2003DAH
China · est. 2009
Panel models
3
vs
356
Max power
700 W
vs
725 W
Max efficiency
22.54%
vs
23.34%
Bifacial share
100%
vs
89%
At a glance
DAH has the broader catalog (356 vs 3 models). DAH leads on peak efficiency at 23.34%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
AKCOME
Website
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Founded
2003
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
No
Stock
-
DAH
Website
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Founded
2009
Employees
-
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
-
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
AKCOME
|
DAH
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 3 | 356 +353 |
| Max Power | 700 W | 725 W +25 W |
| Avg Power | 672 W +150 W | 522 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | 22.54% | 23.34% +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.63% | 22.13% +0.51 pp |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.240%/°C +0.058 | -0.298%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 3 (100%) +11 pp | 316 (89%) |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs +0.5 yr | 29.5 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandAKCOME
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SKA611HDGDC-700W Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | SKA611HDGDC-660W Bi | 660W | 21.2% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | SKA611HDGDC-655W Bi | 655W | 21.1% | -0.240%/°C | Monocrystalline |
DAH
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DHN-66Y18/DG-725 Bi | 725W | 23.3% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | DHN-66Y18/DG-720 Bi | 720W | 23.2% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | DHN-66Y18/DG-715 Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | DAS-DH132NC-715 Bi | 715W | 23.0% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | DAS-DH132NC-710 Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | DHN-66Y18/DG-710 Bi | 710W | 22.9% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | DAS-DH132NC-705 Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | DHN-66Y18/DG-705 Bi | 705W | 22.7% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | DHN-66Y18/DG-700 Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.290%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | DAS-DH132NC-700 Bi | 700W | 22.5% | -0.280%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 3 panels average
Efficiency
21.63%
Temp coeff
-0.240%/°C
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.87%
Temp coeff
-0.286%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
DAH skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
AKCOME Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: HJT (100%)
DAH Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (81%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.