Skip to main content

AKCOME vs Centro Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
VS
Centro Energy
Headquarters not published
Read the Centro Energy review
At a glance

Centro Energy has the broader catalog (13 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
3 13
Highest power
700 Wp 670 Wp
Best efficiency
22.5% 21.6%
Average efficiency
21.6% 20.8%
Bifacial share
100% 0%
Average warranty
30 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Centro Energy
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric AKCOME Centro Energy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 3 13+10
Max Power 700 W+30 W 670 W
Avg Power 672 W+173 W 498 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.54%+0.97 pp 21.57%
Avg Efficiency 21.63%+0.82 pp 20.80%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.240%/°C+0.164 -0.404%/°C
Bifacial Share 3 (100%)+100 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+3.1 yr 26.9 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

Centro Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd, founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010. It has appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer list in the past, though reporting indicates it was dropped from that tracking list in early 2025 after site-accessibility issues, so its current bankability status should be treated as uncertain rather than assured. The company has operated module capacity in the high single-digit gigawatt range (around 9.4 GW modules reported in 2022) and has stated ambitions to scale toward 40 GW over several years, alongside a sizeable mounting-systems business and over 1.5 GW of owned solar farms across Asia-Pacific. Centro Energy is a China- and Vietnam-based cell-to-module manufacturer and system integrator whose panels are sold in more than 40 countries and are IEC61215/IEC61730 certified, with third-party testing reportedly placing them in the upper tier of module quality benchmarks; however, no independent BNEF Tier 1 listing or precise GW-scale production figure for Centro Energy turned up in available sources, so its institutional footprint is harder to verify. On balance, AKCOME shows a longer public track record, stock-market listing, and clearer (if recently contested) Tier 1 history, giving it the stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Product-wise, AKCOME's more recent catalog centers on N-type technology, with its AK iPower line built around heterojunction (HJT) cells - a technology it began investing in as early as 2018 - and its AK iTopper line using TOPCon cells, including a 620 W module aimed at small and medium-sized commercial and residential installations. Centro Energy's range spans a wide 100 W to 670 W power band, covering everything from small residential modules to larger commercial panels, with reported average efficiencies around 20.8% and a headline performance warranty of about 27 years, positioning it as a broad, mid-range supplier for both home rooftops and commercial projects rather than a technology leader in any single cell type.

For a typical 2025 buyer, AKCOME is arguably the more defensible choice for larger or bankability-sensitive projects given its longer corporate history, public listing, and advanced N-type (HJT/TOPCon) product lines, while Centro Energy can be a reasonable pick for standard residential or commercial rooftop jobs where broad wattage options and warranty length matter more than brand pedigree. Buyers evaluating either should independently confirm current BNEF Tier 1 status and specific product datasheets before committing, since public rankings for both brands have shifted recently.

Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-30

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
AKCOME A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Centro Energy
Manufacturers
AKCOME AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Centro Energy
Manufacturers
AKCOME ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM Centro Energy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.