AKCOME vs Centro Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Centro Energy has the broader catalog (13 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer, formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd, founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010. It has appeared on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 module manufacturer list in the past, though reporting indicates it was dropped from that tracking list in early 2025 after site-accessibility issues, so its current bankability status should be treated as uncertain rather than assured. The company has operated module capacity in the high single-digit gigawatt range (around 9.4 GW modules reported in 2022) and has stated ambitions to scale toward 40 GW over several years, alongside a sizeable mounting-systems business and over 1.5 GW of owned solar farms across Asia-Pacific. Centro Energy is a China- and Vietnam-based cell-to-module manufacturer and system integrator whose panels are sold in more than 40 countries and are IEC61215/IEC61730 certified, with third-party testing reportedly placing them in the upper tier of module quality benchmarks; however, no independent BNEF Tier 1 listing or precise GW-scale production figure for Centro Energy turned up in available sources, so its institutional footprint is harder to verify. On balance, AKCOME shows a longer public track record, stock-market listing, and clearer (if recently contested) Tier 1 history, giving it the stronger institutional footprint of the two.
Product-wise, AKCOME's more recent catalog centers on N-type technology, with its AK iPower line built around heterojunction (HJT) cells - a technology it began investing in as early as 2018 - and its AK iTopper line using TOPCon cells, including a 620 W module aimed at small and medium-sized commercial and residential installations. Centro Energy's range spans a wide 100 W to 670 W power band, covering everything from small residential modules to larger commercial panels, with reported average efficiencies around 20.8% and a headline performance warranty of about 27 years, positioning it as a broad, mid-range supplier for both home rooftops and commercial projects rather than a technology leader in any single cell type.
For a typical 2025 buyer, AKCOME is arguably the more defensible choice for larger or bankability-sensitive projects given its longer corporate history, public listing, and advanced N-type (HJT/TOPCon) product lines, while Centro Energy can be a reasonable pick for standard residential or commercial rooftop jobs where broad wattage options and warranty length matter more than brand pedigree. Buyers evaluating either should independently confirm current BNEF Tier 1 status and specific product datasheets before committing, since public rankings for both brands have shifted recently.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-09-30
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.