AKCOME vs BYD - solar panel manufacturer comparison
BYD has the broader catalog (115 vs 3 models). BYD leads on peak efficiency at 23.66%.
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
- Founded
- 1995
- Headquarters
- Shenzhen, China
- Listed
- SZSE: 002594
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
BYD skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (63%)
The flagships
Written summary
BYD is a Chinese manufacturing conglomerate headquartered in Shenzhen, founded in 1995 by Wang Chuanfu. Originally built around lithium battery production, BYD has grown into one of the world's largest makers of electric vehicles and energy storage systems, with solar panels representing one division within a much broader industrial portfolio. The company was added to the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list in 2025, signaling growing institutional recognition. AKCOME, by contrast, is a more specialized solar manufacturer founded in China in 2006, with a reported annual module capacity of approximately 3.8 GW. AKCOME achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status around 2022 but was subsequently removed from that list by the 2024 update cycle. Between the two, BYD carries the stronger institutional footprint simply by virtue of its scale as a global conglomerate with deep capital reserves.
BYD's solar product range is wide, covering residential through utility-scale applications with output spanning roughly 380 W to 730 W, and the company has confirmed deployment of both TOPCon and HJT cell technologies alongside bifacial configurations. This breadth makes BYD suited to diverse project types, from rooftop residential installs to large ground-mounted arrays. AKCOME has historically emphasized HJT technology as a longer-term differentiator, describing it as delivering superior performance in low-light and high-temperature conditions, while also producing TOPCon modules as its mainstream commercial offering. However, AKCOME's HJT modules were delisted from the TaiyangNews top-modules tracking list in January 2025 due to website accessibility issues, and the brand did not appear among top performers in PVEL independent reliability testing in 2024 - both signals worth weighing.
For a typical buyer in 2025, BYD is the more defensible default. Its Tier 1 recognition, broader product ecosystem, and backing from a financially robust parent company reduce bankability risk. AKCOME may appeal to buyers specifically seeking HJT technology at a competitive price point, but the recent delisting events introduce uncertainty that a risk-averse procurer should not ignore.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-14
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.