Skip to main content

Trina Solar vs TCL Zhonghuan - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
VS
TCL Zhonghuan
China Founded 1981 Tier 1
Read the TCL Zhonghuan review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 66 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. TCL Zhonghuan leans bifacial (65% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
340 66
Highest power
760 Wp 725 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 24.6%
Average efficiency
21.7% 23.1%
Bifacial share
43% 65%
Average warranty
28 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
TCL Zhonghuan
Founded
1981
Headquarters
Tianjin, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Trina Solar TCL Zhonghuan
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 340+274 66
Max Power 760 W+35 W 725 W
Avg Power 520 W 585 W+64 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+0.20 pp 24.60%
Avg Efficiency 21.71% 23.13%+1.42 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.302%/°C -0.273%/°C+0.029
Bifacial Share 145 (43%) 43 (65%)+23 pp
Avg Warranty 28.2 yrs 30.0 yrs+1.8 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

TCL Zhonghuan skews to higher efficiency: 58% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

TCL Zhonghuan offers more 600W+ panels (55% of lineup)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

TCL Zhonghuan cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (45%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

TCL Zhonghuan is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Tianjin and backed by the TCL Group. Its origins lie in silicon wafer production - it grew into one of the world's largest wafer suppliers before expanding into finished modules sold under the Huansheng Solar brand. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and reported approximately 15.1 GW in module shipments for 2025, an increase of over 80% year on year, though its module brand ranked around 15th globally by volume. Trina Solar was founded in 1997 by Gao Jifan in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, and has achieved a 100% bankability rating from BNEF in 2025 - the eighth time it has topped that assessment. Cumulative global shipments surpassed 292 GW by mid-2025, and annual module volume of 60-70 GW places Trina among the top five module makers worldwide. On institutional track record and bankability history, Trina Solar holds a clear advantage.

Both manufacturers have built their current portfolios around n-type TOPCon cell technology. TCL Zhonghuan's T5 Pro series, launched in late 2025, spans residential use at 480 W, commercial and industrial applications at 680 W, and utility-scale ground-mount at 760 W, with module efficiency confirmed at up to 25.17%. The company is simultaneously developing BC and shingling cell routes alongside TOPCon as part of a broader n-type product matrix. Trina Solar's Vertex family is similarly segmented: the Vertex S+ targets residential and smaller commercial rooftops in the 465-495 W range with efficiency confirmed at up to 24.3%, while the Vertex N series addresses large-scale commercial and utility projects at outputs above 700 W. Trina backs its flagship modules with a 30-year performance warranty and has been named a PVEL Top Performer for 11 consecutive years.

For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer or a project developer seeking bankable equipment - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default, given its longer module track record, higher global shipment volume, and repeatedly verified quality credentials. TCL Zhonghuan is technically competitive and expanding quickly, and its deep wafer and cell expertise translates into genuine product quality, but its shorter history specifically in the module market may require additional due diligence for project financing. Buyers focused on high efficiency and the latest TOPCon variants will find TCL Zhonghuan a credible alternative rather than a clear second choice.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-20

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Trina Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar TCL Zhonghuan
Manufacturers
Trina Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO TCL Zhonghuan
Manufacturers
Trina Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar TCL Zhonghuan
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 248 Trina Solar offers · See 25 TCL Zhonghuan offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.