Skip to main content

Silfab vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Silfab
Canada Founded 2010 Tier 1
Read the Silfab review
VS
AKCOME
China Founded 2003
Read the AKCOME review
At a glance

Silfab has the broader catalog (47 vs 3 models). Silfab leads on peak efficiency at 22.92%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
47 3
Highest power
640 Wp 700 Wp
Best efficiency
22.9% 22.5%
Average efficiency
20.6% 21.6%
Bifacial share
30% 100%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Silfab

Silfab Solar is a North American leader in the design, development, and manufacture of high-efficiency, premium-quality solar cells and modules. Leveraging over 40 years of solar experience, they operate fully automated facilities in Washington, South Carolina, and Ontario, Canada. Their products are designed and...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Mississauga, Canada
Annual capacity
1.6 GW/year
Employees
800+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
AKCOME
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Silfab AKCOME
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 47+44 3
Max Power 640 W 700 W+60 W
Avg Power 429 W 672 W+243 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.92%+0.38 pp 22.54%
Avg Efficiency 20.56% 21.63%+1.06 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.341%/°C -0.240%/°C+0.101
Bifacial Share 14 (30%) 3 (100%)+70 pp
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs 30.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band
Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

Silfab cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (45%)

AKCOME cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Silfab is a North American solar manufacturer with roots in Canada and a growing footprint in the United States, where it operates a 1.1 GW module factory in Washington state and a newer cell-and-module campus in Fort Mill, South Carolina that received $100 million in financing in late 2024. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, validated by third-party labs Kiwa-PVEL and RETC, and earned "Top Performer" recognition in the Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard for the seventh consecutive year in 2025. AKCOME - formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology - was founded in China in 2006, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010, and by 2023 had shipped more than 15 GW of modules globally while operating across 30-plus countries. AKCOME appeared on Bloomberg's Tier 1 list as recently as 2022 but was reportedly removed in subsequent updates, and a subsidiary - Zhejiang Akcome Photoelectricity Technology - filed for bankruptcy in 2024, raising near-term bankability concerns. On institutional footprint and financial stability, Silfab currently holds the stronger position.

In terms of product focus, Silfab's lineup is built around N-type TOPCon technology for both the residential and commercial-to-utility segments, with lines such as the Elite series targeting premium domestic rooftop installations and larger commercial modules aimed at ground-mount and community solar projects. AKCOME has positioned itself around HJT cell technology with an entirely bifacial portfolio, making its panels nominally well-suited to utility-scale and ground-mounted applications where rear-side gain can be harvested. The all-bifacial, HJT-centric approach is technically ambitious, though the brand's financial turbulence in 2024 complicates long-term warranty confidence.

For a typical buyer in 2025 - especially in the U.S. market - Silfab is the safer default. Its domestic manufacturing qualifies projects for domestic-content adders under the Inflation Reduction Act, its Tier 1 status is currently intact, and its third-party reliability track record is well-documented. AKCOME may offer competitive pricing and technically interesting HJT panels, but the unresolved bankability questions make it a harder sell where long-term warranty backing matters.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-14

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Silfab A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
Silfab AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO AKCOME
Manufacturers
Silfab ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AKCOME
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers · See 2 AKCOME offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.