Skip to main content

Runda Solar vs AIKO - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Runda Solar
China Founded 2009
Read the Runda Solar review
VS
AIKO
China Founded 2009 Tier 1
Read the AIKO review
At a glance

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 6 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Runda Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
6 144
Highest power
730 Wp 805 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 25.2%
Average efficiency
23.1% 23.7%
Bifacial share
100% 24%
Average warranty
30 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Runda Solar

Runda Solar (Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd.) is a high-tech company dedicated to manufacturing world-class solar photovoltaic modules. The company's business covers the entire photovoltaic industry chain, including R&D, production, and sales of PV modules, as well as energy storage and smart grid solutions. Runda Solar...

Founded
2009
Headquarters
Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, China
Annual capacity
4GW (modules), 8GW (cells), 1GWh (energy storage) GW/year
Employees
800+
AIKO
Founded
2009
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Runda Solar AIKO
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 6 144+138
Max Power 730 W 805 W+75 W
Avg Power 718 W+136 W 581 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.50% 25.20%+1.70 pp
Avg Efficiency 23.10% 23.65%+0.55 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.310%/°C -0.271%/°C+0.039
Bifacial Share 6 (100%)+76 pp 35 (24%)
Avg Warranty 30.0 yrs+0.5 yr 29.5 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Runda Solar offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)

Runda Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)

AIKO cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>Back Contact</strong> (83%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Runda Solar, operating as Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province. The company holds TÜV and UL certifications and, as of early 2025, passed European Fire Protection Class 1 certification for its N-type bifacial glass-glass series. However, no evidence in available sources places Runda on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, and its precise annual production scale is not publicly reported. AIKO Solar - formally rooted in a company dating to the mid-2000s and operating under its current structure from a 2016 reorganization - is headquartered in the Guangdong/Shanghai region of China, reports approximately 20 GW of production capacity, and achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status by Q3 2024. AIKO has a decisively stronger institutional footprint, with six gigafactories across multiple Chinese provinces and a European R&D centre, Solarlab AIKO Europe, in Freiburg, Germany.

Runda's catalog spans PERC, TOPCon, and HJT cell technologies and is pitched at residential rooftops, commercial and industrial distributed systems, and utility-scale ground mounts - a broad, value-oriented positioning with limited consumer review coverage on major platforms. AIKO has built its identity almost entirely around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type technology, which relocates electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to reduce shading losses and improve low-light performance. Its Neostar series is aimed squarely at premium residential and commercial rooftops where space efficiency and output per panel command a price premium. AIKO claimed a 2025 record of 24.4% module efficiency for mass-produced panels, and its 30-year performance warranty with a degradation rate of 0.35% per year from year two onward is notably more generous than most competitors.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default choice where budget allows. Its Tier 1 status, verified efficiency records, strong installer feedback - including a first-place finish in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers Choice Awards - and long warranty make it easier to finance and insure on larger projects. Runda is a reasonable consideration for cost-sensitive commercial or utility work where bankability requirements are less strict, but buyers should be aware of its lower visibility in independent reviews and the absence of confirmed Tier 1 standing.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-16

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Runda Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar AIKO
Manufacturers
Runda Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AKCOME AIKO
Manufacturers
Runda Solar ARTsolar
Manufacturers
ASM AIKO
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 166 AIKO offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.