Skip to main content

RedSolar vs Trina Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

RedSolar
China Founded 2008
Read the RedSolar review
VS
Trina Solar
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Trina Solar review
At a glance

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 41 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. RedSolar leans bifacial (88% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
41 340
Highest power
720 Wp 760 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.4% 21.7%
Bifacial share
88% 43%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
RedSolar

Hunan Red Solar New Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (RedSolar) is a state-owned high-tech enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC), one of China's largest Fortune 500 state-owned conglomerates. The company manufactures solar cells, PV modules...

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Changsha, China
Employees
1000-2000
Trina Solar
Founded
1997
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric RedSolar Trina Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 41 340+299
Max Power 720 W 760 W+40 W
Avg Power 582 W+61 W 520 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20% 24.80%+1.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.36%+0.65 pp 21.71%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.303%/°C -0.302%/°C+0.001
Bifacial Share 36 (88%)+45 pp 145 (43%)
Avg Warranty 29.4 yrs+1.2 yr 28.2 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

RedSolar offers more 600W+ panels (61% of lineup)

RedSolar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (83%)

Trina Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (73%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

RedSolar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Hunan Province, founded in 2008 as a state-owned enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC). That institutional lineage gives it six decades of accumulated semiconductor and photovoltaic research expertise. The company reports cumulative module deliveries exceeding 30 GW and claims approximately 50 GW of production lines deployed globally, though its independently verifiable annual production capacity appears to be in the low single-digit GW range. Its BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status could not be confirmed through available public sources. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, occupies a markedly different tier: annual manufacturing capacity exceeds 80 GW, and the company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation continuously for over a decade, consistently ranking among the world's top five module producers. On institutional footprint and lender acceptance, Trina Solar holds a clear and well-documented advantage.

RedSolar's portfolio spans crystalline silicon modules for residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale segments, organized around what the company calls a "1+3+N" business model combining module production, system integration, and energy services. Its state-backed research heritage also extends to in-house module testing and engineering support. Trina Solar's offer is anchored by its Vertex line, built on n-type TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex N and Vertex N Ultra target large ground-mount and utility-scale projects - the flagship module delivers 760 W at 24.5% efficiency. The Vertex S+ G3 addresses residential and commercial rooftop needs, with a full-black variant and a hail- and wind-resistant option suited to demanding climates and planning requirements.

For most buyers - residential owners, commercial developers, or utility procurement teams - Trina Solar is the more defensible default. Its decade-long Tier 1 status satisfies lender due diligence, its supply chain scale ensures module availability, and the Vertex series covers every deployment context. RedSolar is a credible manufacturer with legitimate research credentials and may suit cost-sensitive buyers in markets where CETC's institutional relationships carry commercial weight. Without confirmed Tier 1 bankability, however, it is harder to recommend for financed projects where lender approval of the module brand is a non-negotiable prerequisite.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-07-06

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
RedSolar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Trina Solar
Manufacturers
RedSolar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Trina Solar
Manufacturers
RedSolar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Trina Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 242 Trina Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.