Skip to main content

Q-Cells vs Sunman - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
VS
Sunman
China Founded 2014
Read the Sunman review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 6 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
89 6
Highest power
675 Wp 520 Wp
Best efficiency
23.2% 19.4%
Average efficiency
21.2% 17.7%
Bifacial share
39% 0%
Average warranty
27 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Sunman

Sunman Energy is a technology company pioneering ultra-light, glass-free crystalline silicon solar modules under its proprietary eArc technology — the world's first such product, weighing up to 70% less than conventional glass panels. Founded by Dr. Zhengrong Shi (the founder of Suntech), the company targets niche...

Founded
2014
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
1-2 GW/year
Employees
51-200
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Q-Cells Sunman
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 89+83 6
Max Power 675 W+155 W 520 W
Avg Power 468 W+156 W 312 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.20%+3.80 pp 19.40%
Avg Efficiency 21.21%+3.47 pp 17.74%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.325%/°C+0.031 -0.356%/°C
Bifacial Share 35 (39%)+39 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.0 yrs+2.0 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

Sunman cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (100%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Q-Cells, now operating as Hanwha Q CELLS, is a South Korean-headquartered manufacturer under the Hanwha Solutions conglomerate, tracing its roots to the original German Q-Cells founded in 1999 and acquired by Hanwha in 2012. The company holds confirmed Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and has built out the largest silicon solar module manufacturing capacity in the United States, with facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia together targeting roughly 8.4 GW of annual module output and global shipments anticipated above 9 GW in 2025. Sunman was founded in 2014 in Shanghai by Dr. Zhengrong Shi - the scientist who also founded Suntech - and operates a 1 GW production facility in Yangzhong City, Jiangsu province, with a 500 MW plant under development in Australia's Hunter Valley. Q-Cells carries the stronger institutional footprint by a wide margin, given its scale, Tier 1 standing, and domestic US manufacturing advantage under current trade policy.

Q-Cells' mainstream lineup is built around its Q.ANTUM NEO cell platform, which uses TOPCon architecture and reaches efficiencies above 22.5% in top-tier modules; it serves premium residential rooftops, commercial installations, and utility-scale ground-mount projects, and its temperature coefficient of around -0.29 per degree Celsius is considered strong for hot-climate deployments. Sunman occupies an entirely different niche: its signature eArc panel replaces glass with a lightweight polymer composite, cutting module weight by roughly 70 percent and thickness to approximately 2 mm, which enables installations on curved, heritage, or structurally load-limited surfaces where conventional rigid panels cannot be used. The newest eArc models deliver around 19.2% efficiency and carry a 12-year product warranty alongside a 25-year performance guarantee - shorter on the product side than Q-Cells' 25-year product warranty - and they command a price premium over standard glass-framed panels.

For the large majority of buyers in 2025 - residential homeowners, commercial building owners, or utility developers with standard roof or ground-mount projects - Q-Cells is the more straightforward default, offering proven TOPCon performance, robust bankability, and broad installer support. Sunman is not a direct competitor in those segments; it is a specialist product best evaluated when weight or substrate geometry rules out conventional panels. The two brands are not meaningfully interchangeable for typical use cases.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-05

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Q-Cells A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sunman
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sunman
Manufacturers
Q-Cells AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sunman
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers · See 2 Sunman offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.