Skip to main content

Phono Solar vs Yingli - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Phono Solar
China Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Phono Solar review
VS
Yingli
China Founded 1998 Tier 1
Read the Yingli review
At a glance

Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 174 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Yingli leans bifacial (57% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
174 196
Highest power
730 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.5% 24.1%
Average efficiency
21.8% 21.3%
Bifacial share
43% 57%
Average warranty
27 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Phono Solar

Phono Solar Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, and manufacture of photovoltaic solar panels and is a global provider of solar products and services. The company is affiliated with SUMEC Group, a subsidiary of China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH). Phono Solar has been...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Nanjing, China
Annual capacity
3-4 GW/year
Employees
13000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Yingli

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.

Founded
1998
Headquarters
Baoding, Hebei, China
Annual capacity
2.45 GW/year
Employees
9000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Phono Solar Yingli
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 174 196+22
Max Power 730 W 735 W+5 W
Avg Power 515 W 524 W+9 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.50% 24.10%+0.60 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.77%+0.50 pp 21.28%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.306%/°C+0.024 -0.330%/°C
Bifacial Share 74 (43%) 112 (57%)+15 pp
Avg Warranty 27.1 yrs 27.9 yrs+0.7 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)

Phono Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (37%)

Yingli cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (32%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Phono Solar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Nanjing, established in 2004 as a subsidiary of the SUMEC Group, itself part of the Fortune Global 500 SINOMACH state enterprise conglomerate. That state-backed parentage has given Phono Solar an unusually stable financial foundation for a mid-scale brand, and the company has held continuous BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status since 2014, reaffirmed through at least Q2 2025. Annual production capacity stands at roughly 3 to 4 GW, with cumulative global shipments exceeding 20 GW. Yingli Solar, founded in 1998 in Baoding, Hebei, follows a more dramatic arc: it rose to become the world's largest PV module maker by volume in 2012, then spent the years 2015 to 2020 navigating severe debt restructuring. The company has since stabilised, regained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, and reports annual production capacity in the range of 4 to 7 GW depending on the source consulted. On balance, Phono Solar carries the stronger institutional footprint today, given its uninterrupted Tier 1 record and the implicit support of a state-owned parent.

Both manufacturers now anchor their current portfolios in N-type TOPCon bifacial technology. Phono Solar's lineup spans output classes from residential-scale modules to larger commercial and utility formats, with the flagship Quasar series featuring back-contact cell architecture and module efficiency confirmed above 23%, making it a competitive option for space-constrained residential rooftops as well as utility ground-mount projects. Yingli's equivalent is the Panda 3.0 series, available in Plus and Pro configurations reaching up to 720 Wp at 22.8% module efficiency; the Pro variant targets commercial and industrial rooftops while the Plus is sized for utility-scale ground-mount deployment. Both ranges therefore cover the full application spectrum.

For a typical international buyer, the two brands are broadly interchangeable on technical specifications - both holding Tier 1 status and offering modern N-type TOPCon modules with bifacial gain. Phono Solar is the more conservative institutional choice where lender due diligence requires a clean, uninterrupted bankability record, while Yingli may offer competitive pricing on utility-scale volumes. Buyers wary of Yingli's 2015-2020 difficulties should note the restructuring is complete, but independent financial verification remains advisable before committing to large project exposures.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-22

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Phono Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Yingli
Manufacturers
Phono Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Yingli
Manufacturers
Phono Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Yingli
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 5 Phono Solar offers · See 7 Yingli offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.