Skip to main content

New East Solar vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

New East Solar
Cambodia Tier 1
Read the New East Solar review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 30 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. New East Solar leans bifacial (67% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
30 89
Highest power
715 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
23.0% 23.2%
Average efficiency
21.8% 21.2%
Bifacial share
67% 39%
Average warranty
28 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
New East Solar

New East Solar Energy (NE Solar) is a Cambodia-based solar cell and module manufacturer specializing in high-efficiency Mono and Poly PERC solar cells and modules. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Cambodia, Indonesia, and a new 2 GW factory in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. NE Solar holds a BNEF Tier 1...

Headquarters
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Annual capacity
5-10 GW/year
Employees
201-500
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric New East Solar Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 30 89+59
Max Power 715 W+40 W 675 W
Avg Power 535 W+67 W 468 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.03% 23.20%+0.17 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.79%+0.58 pp 21.21%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.320%/°C+0.005 -0.325%/°C
Bifacial Share 20 (67%)+27 pp 35 (39%)
Avg Warranty 27.5 yrs+0.5 yr 27.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

New East Solar skews to higher efficiency: 7% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

New East Solar offers more 600W+ panels (33% of lineup)

New East Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

New East Solar Energy, trading as NE Solar, is headquartered in Cambodia and operates manufacturing plants in Cambodia, Indonesia, and a 2-GW facility that opened in Phoenix, Arizona, giving the company a total reported nameplate capacity of around 6.7 GW. The company achieved a Bloomberg New Energy Finance Tier 1 ranking in 2024 and has had its modules recognized as PVEL Top Performers, which underlines a credible quality-control track record for a brand that is still building its market presence. Q-Cells, by contrast, traces its roots to Germany and is today owned by South Korea's Hanwha Group. It holds both a BNEF Top Tier bankability score and a 2025 S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech designation, with a global module production capacity reported at roughly 11-12 GW and the largest solar manufacturing plant in the Western Hemisphere located in Dalton, Georgia. On sheer institutional depth and long-term brand recognition, Q-Cells currently carries the stronger footprint.

New East Solar's catalog has been positioned toward large-scale commercial and utility-scale ground-mounted projects, where its PVEL test results and Tier 1 status allow it to compete for project financing. Q-Cells addresses a broader market: its Q.PEAK DUO line, built on PERC cell technology, targets cost-sensitive commercial rooftops, while the Q.TRON series uses heterojunction (HJT) cell architecture and achieves efficiencies up to around 22-23%, making it competitive for premium residential installations. Q-Cells backs current residential models with a 25-year product warranty and guarantees at least 90.58% output retention after 25 years on its Q.TRON line, terms that are difficult for a younger brand to match on a broad scale.

For a typical residential or small commercial buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is the safer default: it offers a proven warranty framework, deep installer network support, U.S.-made inventory, and a multi-decade track record of field performance. New East Solar is a credible choice for developers and EPCs running utility or large C&I projects where PVEL data and bankability matter more than brand familiarity, but it is not yet the obvious pick for everyday rooftop buyers.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-05

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
New East Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
New East Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
New East Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.