Skip to main content

MSolar vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

MSolar
Headquarters not published
Read the MSolar review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 5 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
5 89
Highest power
370 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
19.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
19.3% 21.2%
Bifacial share
0% 39%
Average warranty
25 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric MSolar Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 5 89+84
Max Power 370 W 675 W+305 W
Avg Power 360 W 468 W+108 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 19.80% 23.20%+3.40 pp
Avg Efficiency 19.27% 21.21%+1.94 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.360%/°C -0.325%/°C+0.035
Bifacial Share 0 (0%) 35 (39%)+39 pp
Avg Warranty 25.0 yrs 27.0 yrs+2.0 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

MSolar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

MSolar is a small American solar panel company headquartered in the United States, with operational ties to both San Antonio, Texas and a Virginia-based production facility, though its corporate history and founding date are not well documented in publicly available sources. The company appears to be pursuing a domestic manufacturing model with a stated path toward Tier 1 bankability, but it does not appear on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list as of mid-2025. Q-Cells, by contrast, traces its roots to Germany in 1999, when it was founded as Q-Cells AG in Thalheim with a mission to industrialize solar cell production. South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group acquired the company in 2012, and the resulting entity - Hanwha Q CELLS - is now headquartered in Seoul and Thalheim, with manufacturing in the United States (Dalton, Georgia), South Korea, Malaysia, and China. Hanwha Q CELLS holds Bloomberg Tier 1 status and a module production capacity of approximately 12.4 GW as of late 2024. In terms of institutional scale and bankability, Q-Cells has a substantially stronger footprint.

On the product side, MSolar offers a modest range of modules built around nine-busbar half-cell PERC technology - a proven but increasingly mature p-type architecture - with output in the 365-450 W range and efficiency figures in the 19-21% bracket. The panels are positioned primarily for residential and light commercial rooftop installations in the U.S. market. Q-Cells fields a broader lineup: the Q.PEAK DUO series targets residential all-black aesthetics using Q.ANTUM DUO cell technology, while the Q.TRON series uses n-type TOPCon cells under the proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO platform, reaching efficiencies above 22.5%. This newer n-type line is suited to both premium residential rooftops with limited space and light commercial projects, and a Georgia-manufactured version qualifies for domestic content incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the safer default choice: it carries Tier 1 bankability, a well-documented 25-year product and performance warranty with a low 0.33% annual degradation rate, and a proven track record across residential and commercial segments. MSolar may appeal to buyers who specifically prioritize American manufacturing and are comfortable with a less-established brand, but the limited transparency around the company and its absence from major bankability lists make it a higher-risk selection.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-20

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
MSolar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
MSolar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
MSolar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.